Duffy C M, Addley K
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 May;34(262):261-3.
The use that general practitioners made of the mobile coronary care unit operating from a district general hospital was monitored. Over half of the patients referred by their general practitioners to hospital with suspected acute myocardial infarction were removed by the mobile unit rather than by an ordinary ambulance. However, general practitioner selection of the more compromised patient for admission via the mobile unit indicated that the chance of this category of patient being admitted by the proven best means could be improved. Of the definite cases of infarcts removed to hospital by whatever means, the high proportion which were uncomplicated raises the question whether the general practitioner is attempting to select such patients for home rather than hospital care. The figures for the use of the mobile coronary care unit also indicate that education of the public remains an important task.
对全科医生使用地区综合医院运营的流动冠心病监护病房的情况进行了监测。全科医生转诊至医院疑似急性心肌梗死的患者中,超过一半是由流动监护病房转运的,而非普通救护车。然而,全科医生选择病情较重的患者通过流动监护病房入院,这表明这类患者以经证实的最佳方式入院的机会是可以提高的。无论通过何种方式被送往医院的确诊梗死病例中,无并发症的比例很高,这就引发了一个问题,即全科医生是否试图选择这类患者进行家庭护理而非住院治疗。流动冠心病监护病房的使用数据还表明,公众教育仍是一项重要任务。