Dellipiani A W, Colling W A, Donaldson R J, McCormack P
Br Heart J. 1977 Nov;39(11):1172-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.39.11.1172.
An epidemiological survey of myocardial infarction in Teesside County Borough was completed between April 1972 and April 1973. Cases were notified and divided into those who had suffered a 'definite', 'possible', or 'not' myocardial infarction. Severity factors were measured in the 'definite' cases and the distribution of the various factors studied among home, ward, and coronary care unit treated cases. Increasing severity was found to be related to increased fatality. The fatality of patients treated at home was less than that of those treated in the ward or the coronary care unit. Those who survived to be treated at home were not less severe than those who survived in a comparable group to be treated in hospital using the objective criteria described in the assessment of severity. It is emphasised that the results must be interpreted with caution as other essentially subjective criteria not so easily measurable, but which might have been of considerable influence in the assessment of severity, were not measured in this study.
1972年4月至1973年4月期间,对蒂斯河畔斯托克顿市辖区进行了一项心肌梗死的流行病学调查。病例被通报并分为患有“确诊”、“可能”或“未患”心肌梗死的患者。对“确诊”病例的严重程度因素进行了测量,并研究了在家中、病房和冠心病监护病房接受治疗的病例中各种因素的分布情况。研究发现,严重程度的增加与死亡率的增加有关。在家中接受治疗的患者死亡率低于在病房或冠心病监护病房接受治疗的患者。根据严重程度评估中描述的客观标准,在家中存活接受治疗的患者并不比在医院中存活的可比组患者病情轻。需要强调的是,由于本研究未测量其他一些本质上主观但不易测量、但可能对严重程度评估有相当大影响的标准,因此对结果的解释必须谨慎。