Broom D H
Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(11):909-17. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90261-2.
The relationship between socioeconomic status and ill health has challenged researchers and health practitioners for many years. This paper outlines the way several basic measures of morbidity are related to occupation, income and education, with brief attention to class gradients in mortality and service utilization. The international literature contains many studies showing an inverse gradient in health by social standing: people who are socially and economically well off typically enjoy good health as well. Data from a recent health survey conducted in New South Wales, Australia do not confirm the British findings when occupational categories are studied, but when other measures of status are substituted for the crude occupation categories, a number of patterns appear. Income is significantly associated with the probability of chronic illness among middle-aged men and women, and among women over 65. The predicted pattern is also evident for recent illness among young men and for consulting among elderly respondents, but these associations are not statistically significant. Except among the elderly, better educated men and women are healthier than those with less education on most morbidity measures. The parallels and discrepancies between these findings from an Australian sample and overseas studies raise important research and policy questions.
社会经济地位与健康状况不佳之间的关系多年来一直困扰着研究人员和健康从业者。本文概述了几种发病率基本衡量指标与职业、收入和教育之间的关系,并简要关注了死亡率和服务利用方面的阶层梯度。国际文献中有许多研究表明,健康状况会随着社会地位呈反向梯度变化:社会和经济状况良好的人通常也享有良好的健康状况。在澳大利亚新南威尔士州最近进行的一项健康调查数据显示,当研究职业类别时,并未证实英国的研究结果,但当用其他地位衡量指标替代粗略的职业类别时,出现了一些模式。收入与中年男性和女性以及65岁以上女性患慢性病的概率显著相关。对于年轻男性近期患病情况以及老年受访者的咨询情况,预测模式也很明显,但这些关联在统计学上并不显著。除了老年人之外,在大多数发病率衡量指标上,受教育程度较高的男性和女性比受教育程度较低的人更健康。来自澳大利亚样本的这些发现与海外研究之间的异同提出了重要的研究和政策问题。