Curelaru I, Bylock A, Gustavsson B, Hultman E, Linder L E, Stefánsson T, Stenqvist O
Acta Chir Scand. 1984;150(4):285-93.
The incidence distribution of thrombophlebitis after central catheterization via basilic and cephalic veins was investigated, using 227 catheters made of various plain or heparin-coated materials and with differing stiffness and surface structures. The platelet-adhesion stimulating properties were measured in vitro. Thrombophlebitis showed similar incidence patterns with all catheter types. The maximum incidence of venous reaction was found one to ten days after catheter insertion (central tendency 3-8 days with a peak at 5 days). After ten days the risk of thrombophlebitis fell significantly. The results supported the view that central venous catheters inserted via basilic or cephalic veins should not be withdrawn or exchanged as prophylaxis against thrombophlebitis, at any rate when long-term catheterization is intended. For conclusive comparisons between catheter materials regarding induction of clinically apparent thrombophlebitis, all the patients in the trial should be catheterized for ten days or more, unless symptoms of venous reaction arise earlier.
使用227根由各种普通或肝素涂层材料制成、具有不同硬度和表面结构的导管,研究了经贵要静脉和头静脉进行中心置管后血栓性静脉炎的发病率分布情况。体外测量了血小板黏附刺激特性。所有类型的导管血栓性静脉炎发病率模式相似。静脉反应的最高发病率出现在导管插入后1至10天(集中趋势为3至8天,峰值在第5天)。10天后,血栓性静脉炎的风险显著下降。结果支持这样的观点,即经贵要静脉或头静脉插入的中心静脉导管,无论如何在打算进行长期置管时,不应作为预防血栓性静脉炎的措施而拔出或更换。为了对导管材料在诱发临床明显血栓性静脉炎方面进行确凿比较,试验中的所有患者都应置管10天或更长时间,除非静脉反应症状提前出现。