Centerwall B S
Am J Public Health. 1984 Aug;74(8):813-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.8.813.
It has been assumed that, under comparable socioeconomic conditions, Blacks are more likely than Whites to commit violent acts. To test this assumption, 222 intra-racial domestic homicides (186 Black and 36 White victims) committed in Atlanta, 1971-1972, were subjected to analysis. A domestic homicide was defined as a criminal homicide committed in a residence by a relative or acquaintance of the victim. When Black and White populations were unmatched, the relative risk of intra-racial domestic homicide in Black populations was 5.8 (95 per cent C.I.: 4.3-8.0). When Black and White populations were matched for rates of household crowding, the relative risk of intra-racial domestic homicide in Black populations was no longer significantly elevated (relative risk = 1.2; 95 per cent C.I.: 0.7-2.0). Using rates of household crowding as an index of socioeconomic status, Atlanta Blacks were no more likely to commit domestic homicide than were Whites in comparable socioeconomic circumstances. Further research is needed to determine whether household crowding per se is a risk factor for domestic homicide, independent of socioeconomic status.
人们一直认为,在可比的社会经济条件下,黑人比白人更有可能实施暴力行为。为了验证这一假设,对1971年至1972年在亚特兰大发生的222起族内家庭凶杀案(186名黑人受害者和36名白人受害者)进行了分析。家庭凶杀案被定义为受害者的亲属或熟人在住所实施的刑事杀人案。当黑人和白人人口不匹配时,黑人人口中族内家庭凶杀案的相对风险为5.8(95%置信区间:4.3 - 8.0)。当黑人和白人人口在家庭拥挤率方面进行匹配时,黑人人口中族内家庭凶杀案的相对风险不再显著升高(相对风险 = 1.2;95%置信区间:0.7 - 2.0)。以家庭拥挤率作为社会经济地位的指标,亚特兰大的黑人在可比的社会经济环境下并不比白人更有可能实施家庭凶杀案。需要进一步研究以确定家庭拥挤本身是否是独立于社会经济地位的家庭凶杀案风险因素。