Suppr超能文献

化学发光法与AOAC法测定市售腌肉产品中亚硝酸盐的比较。

Comparison of chemiluminescent and AOAC methods for determining nitrite in commercial cured meat products.

作者信息

Fiddler W, Doerr R C, Gates R A, Fox J B

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1984 May-Jun;67(3):525-8.

PMID:6746475
Abstract

A chemiluminescent detector was used to measure nitrite in a variety of commercial cured meat products, using the AOAC sample preparation procedure, 24.041. A comparison of the NaNO2 values obtained by using sulfanilamide/N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine (SAN/NED) reagent, sulfanilamide/1-naphthylamine reagent, and chemiluminescent detection (CLD) revealed no significant differences between the latter 2 detection methods. The AOAC SAN/NED reagent combination gave an average of 24.6% lower NaNO2 results than CLD. Examination of the sample preparation extraction and heating steps indicated that the procedure could not be made more rapid because of the need to destroy residual reductants and release "bound-complexed-reacted" nitrite from the meat samples.

摘要

采用化学发光检测器,按照美国官方分析化学师协会(AOAC)的样品制备程序24.041,对多种商业腌制肉制品中的亚硝酸盐进行测定。使用磺胺/ N-(1-萘基)乙二胺(SAN / NED)试剂、磺胺/ 1-萘胺试剂和化学发光检测(CLD)所获得的亚硝酸钠(NaNO₂)值进行比较,结果显示后两种检测方法之间没有显著差异。AOAC的SAN / NED试剂组合所得到的NaNO₂结果比CLD平均低24.6%。对样品制备的提取和加热步骤进行检查表明,由于需要破坏残留的还原剂并从肉类样品中释放“结合 - 络合 - 反应”的亚硝酸盐,该程序无法再加快速度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验