Suppr超能文献

两种从腌肉制品中回收亚硝酸盐提取方法的比较。

Comparison of two extraction procedures for recovering nitrite from cured meat products.

作者信息

Sen N P, Lee Y C, McPherson M

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1979 Sep;62(5):1186-8.

PMID:528470
Abstract

A study was undertaken to determine the extent of loss of nitrite during the analytical workup of cured meats for nitrite analysis. Two extraction techniques were compared: (A) a relatively long (2 hr) and hot (80 degrees C) procedure carried out at the natural pH of the sample, and (B) the method of Sen and Donaldson that specifies an alkaline solution and much milder conditions (20 min at 50 degrees C at pH 8) for extraction. The data obtained suggest that considerable losses of nitrite can occur with the former procedure, especially in acidic samples. The overall percentage recoveries of added nitrite by the 2 methods ranged between 20 and 112, and 80 and 114, respectively. Average percentage recoveries for the acidic (pH less than 5) samples only were 47.2 for Method A as compared with 100.2 for Method B.

摘要

开展了一项研究,以确定在腌肉亚硝酸盐分析的分析后处理过程中亚硝酸盐的损失程度。比较了两种提取技术:(A) 在样品自然pH值下进行的相对较长(2小时)且高温(80摄氏度)的程序,以及(B) Sen和Donaldson的方法,该方法规定了碱性溶液和更温和的提取条件(在pH 8下于50摄氏度处理20分钟)。获得的数据表明,前一种程序可能会导致亚硝酸盐大量损失,尤其是在酸性样品中。两种方法对添加亚硝酸盐的总体回收率分别在20%至112%和80%至114%之间。仅针对酸性(pH小于5)样品,方法A的平均回收率为47.2%,而方法B为100.2%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验