Kelly M P, Montgomery M L, Felleman E S, Webb W W
J Clin Psychol. 1984 May;40(3):788-91. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198405)40:3<788::aid-jclp2270400326>3.0.co;2-t.
Compared Verbal, Performance, and Full Scale IQ scores from two groups of neurologically impaired patients (N = 114) similar in age, years of education, occupation, race, sex, and etiology and location of cerebral dysfunction. One group had been given the WAIS and the other the WAIS-R. All three IQ scores were higher for the WAIS group, with Full Scale and Verbal scores significantly (p less than .05) higher. Changes in item content and standardization sample cohort effects are offered as partial possible explanation for the results. The IQ scores from the two tests cannot be considered as interchangeable for neurological patients.
比较了两组神经功能受损患者（N = 114）的言语智商、操作智商和全量表智商得分，这两组患者在年龄、受教育年限、职业、种族、性别以及脑功能障碍的病因和部位方面相似。一组接受了韦氏成人智力量表（WAIS）测试，另一组接受了韦氏成人智力量表修订版（WAIS-R）测试。WAIS组的所有三项智商得分均更高，全量表智商和言语智商得分显著更高（p < 0.05）。项目内容的变化和标准化样本队列效应被作为结果的部分可能解释。对于神经科患者，这两项测试的智商得分不能被视为可互换的。
