Suppr超能文献

评估两种不同遗传标记物用于检测构巢曲霉中移码诱变剂和错义诱变剂的效果。

Evaluation of 2 different genetic markers for the detection of frameshift and missense mutagens in A. nidulans.

作者信息

Bignami M, Carere A, Conti G, Conti L, Crebelli R, Fabrizi M

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1982 Aug;97(4):293-302. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(82)90028-0.

Abstract

21 chemicals, known to induce missense and/or frameshift mutations directly, were assayed for their ability to forward mutate a haploid strain of A. nidulans. 2 genetic markers for forward mutations were used, namely 8-azaguanine resistance and induction of meth A1 suppressors. Missense mutagens were usually active when tested with the plate-incorporation technique, whereas frameshift agents were ineffective; some of these, on the other hand, turned out to be positive when tested with a liquid-test procedure. The 2 genetic markers used showed a similar sensitivity (with only 2 exceptions) in detecting the chemical mutagens assayed.

摘要

对已知能直接诱导错义突变和/或移码突变的21种化学物质进行了检测,以评估它们使构巢曲霉单倍体菌株发生正向突变的能力。使用了2个正向突变的遗传标记,即对8-氮鸟嘌呤的抗性和甲硫氨酸A1抑制子的诱导。当用平板掺入技术检测时,错义诱变剂通常具有活性,而移码诱变剂则无效;另一方面,其中一些在用液体检测程序检测时呈阳性。所使用的这2个遗传标记在检测所分析的化学诱变剂时表现出相似的敏感性(只有2个例外)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验