• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Microbiological sampling of towels: comparison of 7 methods.

作者信息

Castelein C W, Lapré A M, Tamminga S K, Kampelmacher E H

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1982 May;176(2-3):124-33.

PMID:6750989
Abstract

Pull-out roller towels were infected with bacteria and examined with 5 non-destructive methods. In addition to three traditional methods, the agar contact method (A), the swab method (S) and the tape method (T), two lesser known methods have been applied: the rinsing box method (R), new developed in the laboratory, and the filter method (F). In the first (R), the towel is fixed between the lid and the cup of a metal box containing a rinsing liquid; shaking the box completes the test. In the second (F) the liquid is forced through the towel by vacuum. In both experiments the rinsing liquid is tested for contamination. Destructive methods, mainly with a peristaltic blender ("stomacher") (P) or rotary mixer (M), were used as reference for calculating ratios of recovery. With the methods A, S and T, a low ratio of recovery, resp. 5, 10 and 2%, was obtained for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. With method R, ratios for the two species were 60-90%, and also for a Micrococcus species and for spores of Bacillus subtilis. With method F the ratio for E. coli and Micrococcus sp. was even slightly higher than 100%. Recovery with method M was about the same as with P. It is concluded that the rinsing box method as well as the filter method are well suited to the purpose of microbiologically testing towels; the lower recovery of the first is compensated by its simplicity.

摘要

相似文献

1
Microbiological sampling of towels: comparison of 7 methods.
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1982 May;176(2-3):124-33.
2
[A simple wash technic for the recovery of test pathogens in the evaluation of surface disinfection procedures].[一种用于评估表面消毒程序中检测病原体回收的简单冲洗技术]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1984 May;179(2):112-24.
3
[Determination of the number of pathogens in bacterial suspensions using laser nephelometry in comparison to the photometry and plate counting method].[与比浊法和平板计数法相比,使用激光散射比浊法测定细菌悬液中的病原体数量]
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1985 Nov;260(3):329-38.
4
Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.比较BACTEC MYCO/F溶解瓶与隔离管、BACTEC Plus需氧F/瓶以及BACTEC厌氧溶解/10瓶,以及比较BACTEC Plus需氧F/瓶与隔离管从血液中分离细菌、分枝杆菌和真菌的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Dec;39(12):4380-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4380-4386.2001.
5
Comparison of agar sausage, alginate swab and adhesive tape methods for sampling flat surfaces contaminated with bacteria.琼脂香肠法、藻酸盐拭子法和胶带法对被细菌污染的平面进行采样的比较。
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1977 Dec;165(5-6):423-34.
6
[Microbiological assessment of efficiency of antibacterial modified textiles].[抗菌改性纺织品功效的微生物学评估]
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2006;57(2):177-84.
7
[Influence of the mixed inoculum on the species-identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test results by the automated microbial systems].[混合接种物对自动化微生物系统进行菌种鉴定及药敏试验结果的影响]
Rinsho Byori. 2008 Apr;56(4):283-9.
8
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.上流式厌氧污泥床反应器——综述
Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82.
9
[Optimizing microbiological controls of corneal organ culture media].[优化角膜器官培养基的微生物控制]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003 Oct;26(8):792-800.
10
[Validation method for bacteria and fungi count in microbial limit test of drugs].[药品微生物限度检查中细菌和霉菌计数的验证方法]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2005 Dec;30(24):1918-20.