Hinton R J
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1982 Jan;57(1):103-15. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330570111.
Breadth of the interproximal wear facet between lower P2 and M1 and between lower M1 and M2 was measured in human skeletal samples representing the Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippian periods of Tennessee River Valley prehistory, with the aim of assessing relative magnitudes of applied masticatory forces. When stratified by level of occlusal wear, mean interproximal facet breadth was consistently larger in the Archaic sample than in the Mississippi sample, with the Woodland sample intermediate. An analysis of covariance demonstrated that there was significant (p less than or equal to 0.01) differences in facet size among the three groups even when differencs in crown breadth were taken into account. Similar results were obtained in regressions of facet size on chronological age (Archaic larger than Mississippian at P less than or equal to 0.01). Since rate of occlusal wear appears to be somewhat greater in the Archaic sample than in the later samples, the differences in interproximal wear are probably underestimated. It is suggested that the high levels of interproximal wear in the Archaic are indicative of the large occlusal forces and repetitive chewing required to masticate a diet of seeds, wild plant foods, and small animals, for which prior preparation (e.g., grinding, cooking) was minimal or nonexistent (as indicated by paleofecal samples). The lower amounts of interproximal wear observed in the Woodland and Mississippian samples imply considerable reductions in strenous mastication, perhaps due to the widespread adoption during these period of pottery and the earth oven, together with ethnographically-documented techniques of food preparation that transformed most foods to a soft consistency.
在代表田纳西河流域史前时期古风时代、林地时期和密西西比时期的人类骨骼样本中,测量了下颌第二前磨牙与第一磨牙之间以及下颌第一磨牙与第二磨牙之间邻面磨损小平面的宽度,目的是评估施加的咀嚼力的相对大小。按咬合磨损程度分层时,古风时代样本的平均邻面小平面宽度始终大于密西西比样本,林地样本居中。协方差分析表明,即使考虑到牙冠宽度的差异,三组之间的小平面大小仍存在显著差异(p小于或等于0.01)。在按年代年龄对小平面大小进行回归分析时也得到了类似结果(古风时代大于密西西比时期,p小于或等于0.01)。由于古风时代样本的咬合磨损率似乎比后期样本略高,邻面磨损的差异可能被低估了。有人认为,古风时代较高的邻面磨损表明,咀嚼以种子、野生植物性食物和小动物为主的饮食需要较大的咬合力和反复咀嚼,而这些食物之前的加工(如研磨、烹饪)很少或不存在(古粪便样本表明)。在林地时期和密西西比时期样本中观察到的较低邻面磨损量意味着剧烈咀嚼的大幅减少,这可能是由于这两个时期陶器和土炉的广泛使用,以及人种学记录的食物加工技术,这些技术使大多数食物变得质地柔软。