Suppr超能文献

急性呼吸衰竭患者中呼气末正压通气(PEEP)无不良血流动力学效应。

Lack of adverse hemodynamic effects of PEEP in patients with acute respiratory failure.

作者信息

Ellman H, Dembin H

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1982 Nov;10(11):706-11. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198211000-00002.

Abstract

The hemodynamic effects of PEEP ventilation were studied in 6 patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Cardiac index (CI), blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), left cardiac work index (LCWI), and left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) were evaluated in each patient at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm H2O of PEEP. All patients were able to tolerate even the highest level of PEEP without evident clinical sequelae. BP did not change significantly. HR fell significantly at 20 cm H2O of PEEP. LCWI and CI fell at 20 cm H2O of PEEP but the mean fall in CI was only 6% (from 3.47 to 3.27 L/min . M2). LVSWI did not change significantly. PEEP did not produce clinically significant hemodynamic changes. We believe that the avoidance of hypovolemia, limited use of sedative and paralytic drugs, and use of assisted ventilation in the management of our patients contributed substantially to these results though other possible factors cannot be excluded.

摘要

对6例成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者进行了呼气末正压通气(PEEP)的血流动力学效应研究。在呼气末正压为0、5、10、15和20 cm H₂O时,对每位患者的心脏指数(CI)、血压(BP)、心率(HR)、左心做功指数(LCWI)和左心室每搏功指数(LVSWI)进行了评估。所有患者即使在最高水平的呼气末正压下也能耐受,且无明显临床后遗症。血压无显著变化。在呼气末正压为20 cm H₂O时心率显著下降。在呼气末正压为20 cm H₂O时,左心做功指数和心脏指数下降,但心脏指数的平均下降仅为6%(从3.47降至3.27 L/min·m²)。左心室每搏功指数无显著变化。呼气末正压未产生具有临床意义的血流动力学变化。我们认为,在我们对患者的管理中,避免血容量不足、有限使用镇静和麻痹药物以及使用辅助通气对这些结果有很大贡献,尽管其他可能的因素也不能排除。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验