Garner J S, Emori T G, Haley R W
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Dec;155(6):873-80.
We estimated the frequency of selected infection control practices in the operating room from a nationwide survey of hospitals. Our survey confirmed that, in many hospitals, practices which have not received scientific or budgetary scrutiny have become part of the perioperative routine. Almost half of the hospitals reported using nonrecommended tacky, or disinfectant, mats at the entrance to operating rooms, and more than three-fourths were performing nonrecommended environmental cultures in the operating room at a cost ranging from $2,000 to $20,000 per year. When routine nose and throat cultures were taken of operating room personnel, we found an obvious pecking order, rather than a scientific rationale for culturing. In almost all instances, we found wide variations in practice among hospitals. This nonuniformity may be due to such factors as lack of a convincing scientific basis for evaluating the relative efficacy of alternative practices, the strong influence of industry marketing, the individual preferences of surgeons and operating room supervisors and the lack of completeness and agreement of statements from various scientific and professional organizations.
我们通过对全国医院的调查,估算了手术室中选定的感染控制措施的使用频率。我们的调查证实,在许多医院中,那些未经过科学或预算审查的措施已成为围手术期常规操作的一部分。几乎一半的医院报告称在手术室入口处使用未被推荐的粘性或消毒垫,超过四分之三的医院每年花费2000美元至20000美元在手术室进行未被推荐的环境培养。当对手术室人员进行常规的鼻咽喉培养时,我们发现存在明显的等级顺序,而非培养的科学依据。几乎在所有情况下,我们都发现不同医院之间的操作存在很大差异。这种不一致可能是由于以下因素造成的:缺乏令人信服的科学依据来评估替代措施的相对效果、行业营销的强大影响、外科医生和手术室主管的个人偏好,以及各科学和专业组织声明的不完整性和不一致性。