Stewart C F, Melton E T, Karas J, Evans W E
Ther Drug Monit. 1982;4(4):409-12. doi: 10.1097/00007691-198212000-00013.
Analytical error is a potential source of inaccuracy and imprecision in the pharmacokinetic dosing of the aminoglycosides. The present study was undertaken to determine the analytical error (precision and accuracy) associated with the EMIT assay for gentamicin as it is routinely used in a clinical pharmacokinetics laboratory, and to assess what impact this error would have on estimates of pharmacokinetic model parameters. Serum samples spiked with known amounts of gentamicin were assayed over a 6-week period along with routine clinical samples by a medical technologist who was blinded with regard to the expected concentration or number of replicates of each sample. Under these conditions, the assay method had a coefficient of variation (CV) of 4.8%. When this analytical error was incorporated into a first-order, one-compartment pharmacokinetic model, the CV was 0.8% for the y intercept and 1.2% for the slope. When all measured concentrations were compared with actual values, the slope and intercept were not significantly different from the line of reference. As indicated by these data, the EMIT assay for gentamicin as it is routinely used in a clinical laboratory is both precise and accurate, indicating that analytical error is not the major source of inaccuracy in pharmacokinetic dosing of gentamicin.
分析误差是氨基糖苷类药物药代动力学给药中不准确和不精确的潜在来源。本研究旨在确定临床药代动力学实验室常规使用的庆大霉素EMIT检测法的分析误差(精密度和准确度),并评估该误差对药代动力学模型参数估计的影响。在6周的时间内,由一名对每个样本的预期浓度或重复次数不知情的医学技术人员,对添加了已知量庆大霉素的血清样本以及常规临床样本进行检测。在这些条件下,该检测方法的变异系数(CV)为4.8%。当将此分析误差纳入一级单室药代动力学模型时,y轴截距的CV为0.8%,斜率的CV为1.2%。当将所有测量浓度与实际值进行比较时,斜率和截距与参考线无显著差异。如这些数据所示,临床实验室常规使用的庆大霉素EMIT检测法既精确又准确,表明分析误差不是庆大霉素药代动力学给药不准确的主要来源。