Greenberg S B, Harmon M W, Tyrrell D A, Scott G M
Tex Rep Biol Med. 1981;41:549-54.
It is not yet clear from these recent volunteer studies (8) and from the results of Merigan et al. (14) what the optimal method and schedule for administering HuIFN should be. Taken together, the results with relatively low doses of interferon (1 to 4 X 10(6) units) plus antihistamine pretreatment, and with multiple doses of HuIFN alpha (total 14 X 10(6) units) indicate the need for better methods of delivery. However, it is of interest that protection was achieved by extremely small amounts of HuIFN alpha protein - Merigan (14) used only about 160 mcg. We anticipate that with better supplies of interferon from HuIFN genes cloned in bacteria, we may seek more efficient means of delivery and obtain better protection of volunteers against respiratory virus infections.
从这些近期的志愿者研究(8)以及梅里根等人(14)的研究结果中,目前尚不清楚给予人干扰素(HuIFN)的最佳方法和给药方案应该是什么。综合来看,相对低剂量的干扰素(1至4×10⁶单位)加上抗组胺药预处理的结果,以及多剂量的人干扰素α(总计14×10⁶单位)的结果表明需要更好的给药方法。然而,有趣的是,极少量的人干扰素α蛋白就能实现保护作用——梅里根(14)仅使用了约160微克。我们预计,随着从细菌中克隆的人干扰素基因生产出更多的干扰素,我们可能会寻求更有效的给药方式,并使志愿者获得更好的针对呼吸道病毒感染的保护。