Sapico F L, Lindquist L B, Montgomerie J Z, Jimenez E M, Morrow J W
Urology. 1980 May;15(5):457-60. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(80)90004-7.
Twenty-nine patients with spinal cord injury and asymptomatic urinary tract infection were treated with standard or reduced doses of tobramycin and amikacin. The patients received five days of intramuscular antibiotics. Most of the patients in the tobramycin groups had Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and most of those in the amikacin group had either Proteus rettgeri or Providencia stuartii infections. Only 1 patient had a positive urine antibody coating test. High antibiotic concentrations were demonstrated in the urine of all patients during therapy. Urine cultures were obtained two and seven days after completion of therapy. Forty-eight per cent of the patients were cured, while 31 per cent showed persistence or relapse, and 21 per cent had reinfection with other bacteria. No significant differences in results were observed between the standard-dose and low-dose regimens and between the amikacin and tobramycin groups. The low success rate of the regimens used may indicate the need to evaluate alternative therapeutic regimens to treat urinary tract infections in this special group of patients.
29例脊髓损伤且有无症状性尿路感染的患者接受了标准剂量或减量的妥布霉素和阿米卡星治疗。患者接受了为期5天的肌肉注射抗生素治疗。妥布霉素组的大多数患者感染铜绿假单胞菌,阿米卡星组的大多数患者感染雷氏变形杆菌或斯氏普罗威登斯菌。只有1例患者尿抗体包裹试验呈阳性。治疗期间所有患者尿液中均显示出高抗生素浓度。治疗结束后第2天和第7天进行尿培养。48%的患者治愈,31%的患者病情持续或复发,21%的患者再次感染其他细菌。标准剂量与低剂量方案之间以及阿米卡星组与妥布霉素组之间在治疗结果上未观察到显著差异。所用治疗方案的低成功率可能表明需要评估替代治疗方案来治疗这一特殊患者群体的尿路感染。