Bauer D L, Garrison R W, McRoberts J W
J Urol. 1980 Mar;123(3):386-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55947-9.
After critically reviewing 601 patients who had undergone transurethral resection of the prostate we conclude that the routine use of excretory urography is not indicated. In the vast majority of patients with only obstructive symptoms or acute urinary retention excretory urography is an expensive test, with an extremely low incidence of useful information. However, its selective use is indicated in cases in which hematuria or a history of renal disease coexists with obstructive symptoms. The time has arrived for physicians to re-evaluate the practices of the past. We all need to participate actively and to make specific recommendations, not generalities. We believe that if the guide lines suggested herein are considered the annual health costs would be decreased by an estimated $75,000,000 and the quality of urologic care would not be jeopardized.
在对601例接受经尿道前列腺切除术的患者进行严格审查后,我们得出结论,排泄性尿路造影的常规使用并无必要。在绝大多数仅有梗阻症状或急性尿潴留的患者中,排泄性尿路造影是一项昂贵的检查,能提供有用信息的发生率极低。然而,当血尿或肾脏疾病史与梗阻症状并存时,有必要选择性地使用该项检查。医生重新评估过去的做法的时候到了。我们都需要积极参与并提出具体建议,而非泛泛而谈。我们认为,如果考虑本文建议的指导方针,每年的医疗费用估计将减少7500万美元,且泌尿外科护理质量不会受到影响。