Suppr超能文献

三种游离甲状腺素检测方法的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of three free-thyroxine assays.

作者信息

Szpunar W E, Block M, Bednarz M N, Stoffer S S

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 1980 Jun;21(6):576-8.

PMID:6770058
Abstract

The free thyroxine (FT4) test of Clinical Assays, Corning Medical, and Damon Diagnostics were evaluated in 245 patients. Although all three assays generally correlated well with the clinical functional status, there were apparent discrepancies in the clinically euthyroid population. All patients with discordant values had either relatively high or low triiodothyronine (T3) uptakes. In these instances, the free-thyroxine index gave a more accurate assessment of the clinical thyroid status than did the FT4. In our opinion, these findings place a critical limitation on these assays as a replacement for the free-thyroxine index.

摘要

对康宁医疗公司(Clinical Assays)、达蒙诊断公司(Damon Diagnostics)的游离甲状腺素(FT4)检测方法进行了245例患者的评估。虽然这三种检测方法总体上与临床功能状态相关性良好,但在临床甲状腺功能正常人群中存在明显差异。所有检测值不一致的患者,其三碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)摄取率相对较高或较低。在这些情况下,游离甲状腺素指数比FT4能更准确地评估临床甲状腺状态。我们认为,这些发现严重限制了这些检测方法替代游离甲状腺素指数的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验