• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MDA和DOM:在大鼠中不会产生类似苯丙胺辨别刺激效应的取代苯丙胺类物质。

MDA and DOM: substituted amphetamines that do not produce amphetamine-like discriminative stimuli in the rat.

作者信息

Shannon H E

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;67(3):311-2. doi: 10.1007/BF00431274.

DOI:10.1007/BF00431274
PMID:6770411
Abstract

3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) are amphetamine congeners that produce both amphetamine-like and LSD-like effects. To evaluate whether MDA and DOM should be classed with amphetamine, their capacity to produce amphetamine-like discriminative stimuli was assessed. Rats were trained to discriminate between saline and 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine in a two choice, discrete trial shock avoidance paradigm. Neither MDA nor DOM produced any amphetamine-appropriate responding when tested over a 30-fold dose range. The specificity of the procedure to detect amphetamine-like effects was demonstrated by the failure of LSD to produce any amphetamine-appropriate responding. These results suggest that neither MDA nor DOM should be classed as amphetamine-like agents.

摘要

3,4-亚甲二氧基苯丙胺(MDA)和2,5-二甲氧基-4-甲基苯丙胺(DOM)是苯丙胺同系物,会产生类似苯丙胺和类似麦角酸二乙酰胺(LSD)的效应。为评估MDA和DOM是否应归类于苯丙胺类,对它们产生类似苯丙胺辨别刺激的能力进行了评估。在双选择、离散试验电击回避范式中,训练大鼠区分生理盐水和1.0毫克/千克右旋苯丙胺。在30倍剂量范围内进行测试时,MDA和DOM均未产生任何与苯丙胺相符的反应。LSD未能产生任何与苯丙胺相符的反应,证明了该程序检测类似苯丙胺效应的特异性。这些结果表明,MDA和DOM均不应归类为类似苯丙胺的药物。

相似文献

1
MDA and DOM: substituted amphetamines that do not produce amphetamine-like discriminative stimuli in the rat.MDA和DOM:在大鼠中不会产生类似苯丙胺辨别刺激效应的取代苯丙胺类物质。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;67(3):311-2. doi: 10.1007/BF00431274.
2
Further investigation of the discriminative stimulus properties of MDA.对3,4-亚甲基二氧基苯丙胺辨别刺激特性的进一步研究。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Apr;20(4):501-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(84)90295-8.
3
The discriminative stimulus properties of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM): differentiation from amphetamine.2,5-二甲氧基-4-甲基苯丙胺(DOM)的辨别刺激特性:与苯丙胺的区分
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;68(3):209-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00428105.
4
Drug discrimination studies with MDMA and amphetamine.使用摇头丸和安非他明的药物辨别研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;95(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00212770.
5
The effects of d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) and d-amphetamine on operant responding in control and 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats.d-麦角酸二乙酰胺(LSD)、2,5-二甲氧基-4-甲基苯丙胺(DOM)和d-苯丙胺对正常及6-羟基多巴胺处理大鼠操作性反应的影响。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980 Nov;13(5):621-6. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(80)90002-7.
6
Assessment of the MDA and MDMA optical isomers in a stimulant-hallucinogen discrimination.在兴奋剂-致幻剂辨别中对MDA和MDMA光学异构体的评估。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997 Aug;57(4):737-48. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00334-6.
7
1-(2,3-Methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (2,3-MDA): a preliminary investigation.1-(2,3-亚甲二氧基苯基)-2-氨基丙烷(2,3-MDA):初步研究。
Gen Pharmacol. 1984;15(4):361-2. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(84)90016-8.
8
Discriminative stimulus properties of MDA analogs.MDA类似物的辨别性刺激特性。
Biol Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;17(7):807-14.
9
Differences in the stimulus properties of 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine and 3,4- methylenedioxymethamphetamine in animals trained to discriminate hallucinogens from saline.在经过训练以区分致幻剂和生理盐水的动物中,3,4-亚甲基二氧基苯丙胺和3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺刺激特性的差异。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988 Sep;246(3):866-70.
10
MDA: a psychoactive agent with dual stimulus effects.MDA:一种具有双重刺激作用的精神活性物质。
Life Sci. 1984 Jan 23;34(4):379-83. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(84)90627-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of the associative nature of sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and of the environment dependent placebo-like response.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;95(4):482-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00172959.
2
Drug discrimination studies with MDMA and amphetamine.使用摇头丸和安非他明的药物辨别研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;95(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00212770.

本文引用的文献

1
Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats.
Fed Proc. 1974 Jul;33(7):1814-24.
2
Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine and related compounds in rats.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1974 Sep-Oct;2(5):669-73. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(74)90036-7.
3
A comparison of the discriminative stimulus properties of R-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (R-DOM) and S-amphetamine in the rat.大鼠中R-2,5-二甲氧基-4-甲基苯丙胺(R-DOM)和S-苯丙胺辨别刺激特性的比较。
Psychopharmacologia. 1975 Nov 21;44(3):225-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00428898.
4
The effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine (DOET), d-amphetamine, and cocaine in rats trained with mescaline as a discriminative stimulus.2,5-二甲氧基-4-甲基苯丙胺(DOM)、2,5-二甲氧基-4-乙基苯丙胺(DOET)、右旋苯丙胺和可卡因对以三甲氧苯乙胺作为辨别刺激进行训练的大鼠的影响。
Psychopharmacologia. 1975 Oct 14;44(1):29-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00421179.
5
Comparison of behavior maintained by infusions of eight phenylethylamines in baboons.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1976 Nov 24;50(3):251-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00426841.
6
The identification of LSD-like hallucinogens using the chronic spinal dog.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1978 Mar;3(2):113-23. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(78)90024-8.
7
Evaluation of the discriminative effects of morphine in the rat.吗啡对大鼠辨别效应的评估。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1976 Jul;198(1):54-65.