Bonner T I, Heinemann R, Todaro G J
Nature. 1980 Jul 24;286(5771):420-3. doi: 10.1038/286420a0.
It is generally accepted that there are six major groups of living primates: (1) lemurs (including all the primates of Madagascar), (2) lorises (including galago and potto), (3) tarsiers, (4) New World monkeys, (5) Old World monkeys and (6) apes (including man). Tree shrews, once considered to be primates, are now generally recognized as not significantly more closely related to the six groups than other mammals. The first surviving primate lines to diverge from the common primate ancestor are believed to have given rise to one or more of the first three groups. However, the fossil record is insufficient to determine their relative branching order. Furthermore, neither morphological considerations nor studies of protein evolution produce unanimity as to whether tarsiers are more closely related to the prosimians (the lemurs plus lorises) or the simians (the monkeys and apes). In an attempt to resolve these discrepancies, we have measured the DNA sequence difference between several primates. We report here that the evolution of DNA of primates from Madagascar is significantly less than that of all other groups of living primates. This is not expected in the simplest form of the theory of neutral selection and may be important for our understanding of evolution at the molecular level.
(1)狐猴(包括马达加斯加的所有灵长类动物),(2)懒猴(包括婴猴和蜂猴),(3)眼镜猴,(4)新大陆猴,(5)旧大陆猴,以及(6)猿(包括人类)。树鼩曾被认为是灵长类动物,现在普遍认为它们与这六类动物的关系并不比其他哺乳动物更为密切。最早从灵长类共同祖先分化出来的现存灵长类谱系,被认为产生了前三类中的一类或多类。然而,化石记录不足以确定它们的相对分支顺序。此外,无论是形态学考量还是蛋白质进化研究,都无法就眼镜猴与原猴亚目(狐猴和懒猴)还是类人猿亚目(猴和猿)关系更为密切达成一致。为了解决这些差异,我们测量了几种灵长类动物之间的DNA序列差异。我们在此报告,马达加斯加灵长类动物的DNA进化明显少于其他所有现存灵长类动物群体。在中性选择理论的最简单形式中,这是出乎意料的,可能对我们在分子水平上理解进化很重要。