Itano M
Am J Clin Pathol. 1980 Oct;74(4 Suppl):535-41.
There were over 500 participants in the first year of the Survey. Ninety per cent identified themselves as clinical chemistry/pathology laboratories. Of the three analytes, pH was determined with the best interlaboratory precision and PO2 the lowest. Evaluation of accuracy was not possible because of the lack of an acceptable reference method. Interinstrument differences could be demonstrated by using all-methods results as a point of reference. Differences were more related to each individual instrument than to manufacturer. Because the survey specimens were buffered aqueous solutions that do not have all the characteristics of blood, results should be interpreted with caution. Some of the results, especially but not exclusively PO2, are artifacts of the survey material rather than a reflection of the state of the art of pH and blood gas analysis.
该调查第一年有500多名参与者。其中90%称自己为临床化学/病理实验室。在这三种分析物中,pH的实验室间精密度最佳,而PO2的精密度最低。由于缺乏可接受的参考方法,无法进行准确度评估。通过将所有方法的结果作为参考点,可以证明仪器间的差异。差异更多地与每台仪器本身有关,而非与制造商有关。由于调查样本是缓冲水溶液,并不具备血液的所有特性,因此对结果的解读应谨慎。部分结果,尤其是但不限于PO2,是调查材料的人为产物,而非pH和血气分析技术水平的反映。