Suppr超能文献

原料药及制剂中青霉胺测定方法的比较

Comparison of methods for determining penicillamine in bulk drug and formulations.

作者信息

Vollmer P J, Lee J, Alexander T G

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1980 Nov;63(6):1191-4.

PMID:6778852
Abstract

The mercuric acetate method (Method I) cited in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as the official method for determining the penicillamine content of a drug was compared with a nonaqueous amine titration (Method II), a nonaqueous acid titration (Method III), and a hydroxylamine assay (Method IV). Quantitative determinations were made for 3 types of penicillamine samples: commercial lots of bulk drug, capsules, and test solutions containing known amounts of penicillamine and EDTA. Method III proved unsatisfactory in the bulk drug determinations. Method II, although slightly less precise than Method I, gave generally satisfactory results for the bulk drug and capsule samples. Method IV was the only method to give satisfactory results in the presence of EDTA.

摘要

《联邦法规法典》(CFR)中引用的乙酸汞法(方法I)作为测定药物中青霉胺含量的官方方法,与非水胺滴定法(方法II)、非水酸滴定法(方法III)和羟胺分析法(方法IV)进行了比较。对3种类型的青霉胺样品进行了定量测定:原料药商业批次、胶囊以及含有已知量青霉胺和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)的测试溶液。方法III在原料药测定中结果不理想。方法II虽然比方法I稍欠精确,但对原料药和胶囊样品总体上给出了令人满意的结果。方法IV是唯一在有EDTA存在时能给出满意结果的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验