Passath A, Stradner F, Petritsch W, Leb G
Acta Med Austriaca. 1981;8(3):75-81.
Euthyroid in-patients were investigated with 100 micrograms TRH given intravenously and with 40 mg TRH given orally in order to compare the sensitivity of intravenous and oral TRH-test. In all patients (age 15-91 years) maximal TSH-levels 180 min after 40 mg TRH are significantly (p less than 0.01) higher than maximal TSH-levels 30 min after 100 micrograms TRH. In patients under 50 years of age TSH-30 and TSH-180 are identical on average (6.42 +/- 0.29 microunits/ml vs. 6.53 +/- 0.54 microunits/ml/log x +/- SDlog). In patients older than 50 years TSH-30 is significantly lower (p less than 0.02) than in patients aging less than 50 years (2.11 +/- 0.88 microunits/ml vs. 6.42 +/- 0.29 microunits/ml). Both age-related groups demonstrate no significant difference (p greater than 0.2) in TSH-180 after 40 mg TRH (6.53 +/- 0.54 microunits/ml vs. 3.65 +/- 0.74 microunits/ml). 14 cases (34%) are low or non responders to 100 micrograms TRH intravenously, 8 (19.5%) only following 40 mg TRH orally. Patients with complete TSH-suppression (both iv. and oral TRH-test negative) show significant (p less than 0.05) higher ETR, T4 and fT4 than patients with partial TSH-suppression (iv. negative and oral TRH-test positive). The dose of 100 micrograms TRH does not increase the sensitivity of the test, the specificity is decreased in older patients, the dose of 100 micrograms TRH seems to be to low to yield reliable results. 40 mg TRH orally does not show any false positive findings, because TSH-stimulation is longer and more intensive. T3 increase three hours after orally TRH-application indicates an intact feedback mechanism.
对甲状腺功能正常的住院患者静脉注射100微克促甲状腺激素释放激素(TRH)并口服40毫克TRH进行研究,以比较静脉注射和口服TRH试验的敏感性。在所有患者(年龄15 - 91岁)中,40毫克TRH后180分钟的促甲状腺激素(TSH)最高水平显著高于(p < 0.01)100微克TRH后30分钟的TSH最高水平。50岁以下患者的TSH - 30和TSH - 180平均相同(6.42±0.29微单位/毫升 vs. 6.53±0.54微单位/毫升/log x±标准差log)。50岁以上患者的TSH - 30显著低于(p < 0.02)50岁以下患者(2.11±0.88微单位/毫升 vs. 6.42±0.29微单位/毫升)。两个年龄组在40毫克TRH后TSH - 180方面均无显著差异(p > 0.2)(6.53±0.54微单位/毫升 vs. 3.65±0.74微单位/毫升)。14例(34%)对静脉注射100微克TRH反应低下或无反应,8例(19.5%)仅在口服40毫克TRH后出现这种情况。促甲状腺激素完全抑制的患者(静脉注射和口服TRH试验均为阴性)的有效促甲状腺激素释放激素(ETR)、甲状腺素(T4)和游离甲状腺素(fT4)显著高于(p < 0.05)促甲状腺激素部分抑制的患者(静脉注射阴性且口服TRH试验阳性)。100微克TRH的剂量并未提高试验的敏感性,老年患者的特异性降低,100微克TRH的剂量似乎过低,无法得出可靠结果。口服40毫克TRH未出现任何假阳性结果,因为TSH刺激时间更长且更强烈。口服TRH后三小时三碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)升高表明反馈机制完整。