Suppr超能文献

荷兰宫颈癌人群筛查和再筛查的成本效益

Cost effectiveness of population screening and rescreening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Boon M E, de Graaff Guilloud J C

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1981 Sep-Oct;25(5):539-42.

PMID:6792845
Abstract

In a screening program for cervical cancer held in the western part of the Netherlands in 1978, it was shown that the incidence of positive cases dropped from 8.0% to 1.4% when repeat screening was performed within two years; however, the incidence of mild dysplasia remained the same (13.0%). Forty percent of the allocated funds were used for canvassing. Recanvassing of the no-response group did not result in the finding of positive cases. Of the ten positive cases in the rescreened group, four had had inadequate negative smears previously, and two had had adequate negative smears; in two cases the previous smears were reclassified as dysplasias, and in the two remaining cases endocervical carcinoma cells were found in the additional endocervical smear. In light of the high canvassing costs of population screening and the low detection rate of positive cases in the rescreened group, as described in this paper, it appears overly costly to repeat population screening with two years.

摘要

在1978年于荷兰西部开展的一项宫颈癌筛查项目中,结果显示,若在两年内进行重复筛查,阳性病例的发生率从8.0%降至1.4%;然而,轻度发育异常的发生率保持不变(13.0%)。所分配资金的40%用于拉票活动。对无回应组再次拉票并未发现阳性病例。在重新筛查组的10例阳性病例中,4例之前的涂片检查结果为阴性但不合格,2例之前的涂片检查结果为合格阴性;2例之前的涂片被重新归类为发育异常,在其余2例中,在额外的宫颈管涂片检查中发现了宫颈管癌细胞。鉴于本文所述的人群筛查拉票成本高昂且重新筛查组阳性病例的检出率较低,在两年内重复进行人群筛查似乎成本过高。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验