Hulsbosch M A, Binkhorst R A, Folgering H T
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1981;47(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00422485.
Investigations in our laboratory have shown an increased slope of the ventilatory response curve to CO2 (CO2 sensitivity) during positive and negative exercise as compared with the resting condition. CO2 sensitivity during positive and negative exercise did not differ in spite of differences in metabolism (VO2, VCO2) and type of muscle contraction (concentric or eccentric). Various aspects of positive and negative exercise were examined in order to find out whether they can explain the identical CO2 sensitivity. Cardiac output, oxygen consumption, rectal temperature and venous catecholamine concentration appeared to be higher in positive exercise than in negative exercise, and higher in negative exercise than at rest. However, these differences between the two types of exercise contrast with the identical CO2 sensitivity and thus cannot be of major importance in determining CO2 sensitivity. It is hypothesized that one or more of these variables might be responsible for increased CO2 sensitivity during exercise as compared with rest. The CO2 sensitivity, once increased, seems to be unaffected by further increases in these variables.
我们实验室的研究表明,与静息状态相比,正向运动和反向运动期间对二氧化碳的通气反应曲线斜率(二氧化碳敏感性)增加。尽管代谢(耗氧量、二氧化碳排出量)和肌肉收缩类型(向心或离心)存在差异,但正向运动和反向运动期间的二氧化碳敏感性并无不同。对正向运动和反向运动的各个方面进行了研究,以确定它们是否能够解释相同的二氧化碳敏感性。正向运动时的心输出量、耗氧量、直肠温度和静脉儿茶酚胺浓度似乎高于反向运动,而反向运动时又高于静息状态。然而,这两种运动类型之间的这些差异与相同的二氧化碳敏感性形成对比,因此在确定二氧化碳敏感性方面可能并不重要。据推测,与静息相比,这些变量中的一个或多个可能是运动期间二氧化碳敏感性增加的原因。一旦二氧化碳敏感性增加,似乎不受这些变量进一步增加的影响。