Dayem H M, Breen J, Leslie E V
Clin Nucl Med. 1978 May;3(5):196-201. doi: 10.1097/00003072-197805000-00008.
Forty-eight patients were scanned with 111 In-chloride in an attempt to identify the cause of fever. Fifteen true positive scans, 30 true negatives, and 3 false negatives were found. Of the 15 true positives, 7 cases of abdominal or pelvic abscess, and 8 cases of alcoholic hepatitis were detected. The 3 false negatives included: 1) an abscess in the anterior abdominal wall; 2) an abscess in the right upper quadrant at the site of a necrotic gallbladder; and 3) a tuberculous abscesss of the lumbar spine. Examples from the different categories, pitfalls in interpretation and advantages and disadvantages of scanning with 111In-chloride will be presented. These studies indicate that 111In-chloride is a safe, reliable scanning agent for abscesses below the diaphragm especially in patients who cannot undergo adequate bowel preparation.
48例患者接受了氯化铟-111扫描，以试图确定发热原因。发现15例假阳性扫描、30例假阴性扫描和3例假阴性。在15例假阳性中，检测到7例腹部或盆腔脓肿以及8例酒精性肝炎。3例假阴性包括：1）前腹壁脓肿；2）坏死胆囊部位的右上腹脓肿；3）腰椎结核脓肿。将展示不同类别中的示例、解读中的陷阱以及氯化铟-111扫描的优缺点。这些研究表明，氯化铟-111是一种用于膈下脓肿的安全、可靠的扫描剂，尤其适用于无法进行充分肠道准备的患者。
