Day M C, Bissell J S
Child Dev. 1978 Jun;49(2):353-61.
4-year-olds made same and different judgments about pairs of stimuli requiring detailed comparison in 2 conditions: a judgment-only condition and a justification condition in which children explained the reasons for their judgments. The systematic comparison strategies revealed in the justifications indicated that all children had definite criteria for "same" and "different" although about two-thirds of the children used a criterion that differed from the adult criterion. Judgments were more accurate in the justification than in the judgment-only condition, suggesting that overt verbalizations and gestures may provide a beneficial external support for completion of a child's own visual comparison strategy.
4岁儿童在两种情况下,对需要详细比较的刺激物对做出相同和不同的判断:一种是仅判断条件,另一种是辩护条件,即儿童解释其判断的原因。辩护中揭示的系统比较策略表明,所有儿童都有明确的“相同”和“不同”标准,尽管约三分之二的儿童使用的标准与成人标准不同。与仅判断条件相比,辩护条件下的判断更准确,这表明公开的言语表达和手势可能为儿童自身视觉比较策略的完成提供有益的外部支持。