Marek J, Límanová Z, Srámková J
Endokrinologie. 1981 Oct;78(1):57-66.
The effects of 40 mg oral and 200 microgram intravenous TRH were studied in patients with active acromegaly. Administration of oral TRH to each of 14 acromegalics resulted in more pronounced TSH response in all patients and more pronounced response of triiodothyronine in most of them (delta max TSh after oral TRh 36.4 +/- 10.0 (SEM) mU/l vs. delta max TSH after i.v. TRH 7.7 +/- 1.5 mU/l, P less than 0.05; delta max T3 after oral TRH 0.88 +/- 0.24 nmol/vs. delta max T3 after i.v. TRH 0.23 +/- 0.06 nmol/l, P less than 0.05). Oral TRH elicited unimpaired TSH response even in those acromegalics where the TSH response to i.v. TRH was absent or blunted. In contrast to TSH stimulation, oral TRH did not elicit positive paradoxical growth hormone response in any of 8 patients with absent stimulation after i.v. TRH. In 7 growth hormone responders to TRH stimulation the oral TRH-induced growth hormone response was insignificantly lower than that after i.v. TRH (delta max GH after oral TRH 65.4 +/- 28.1 microgram/l vs. delta max GH after i.v. TRH 87.7 +/- 25.6 microgram/l, P greater than 0.05). In 7 acromegalics 200 microgram i.v. TRH represented a stronger stimulus for prolactin release than 40 mg oral TRH (delta max PRL after i.v. TRH 19.6 +/- 3.22 microgram/, delta max PRL after oral TRH 11.1 +/- 2.02 microgram/, P less than 0.05).
In acromegalics 40 mg oral TRH stimulation is useful in the evaluation of the function of pituitary thyrotrophs because it shows more pronounced effect than 200 microgram TRH intravenously. No advantage of oral TRH stimulation was seen in the assessment of prolactin stimulation and paradoxical growth hormone responses.
