Suppr超能文献

Validity of anecdotal reports of suspected adverse drug reactions: the problem of false alarms.

作者信息

Venning G R

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Jan 23;284(6311):249-52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6311.249.

Abstract

Suspected adverse drug reactions first reported in 1963 in the "British Medical Journal," the "Lancet," the "Journal of the American Medical Association," and the "New England Journal of Medicine" were reviewed 18 years later to assess their initial validity and subsequent verification. Of 52 first reports, five were deliberate investigations into potential or predictable reactions, and in each case causality was reasonably established; the other 47 reports were essentially anecdotal. Of these 47 reports, 14 related to categories of adverse reaction where false-positive reports were unlikely: immediate reactions, local reactions, and known reactions caused by a different mode of administration or a brand previously thought or claimed to be safe. The problem of false alarms rose in the remaining types of reactions: general reactions that did not occur immediately after administration and arose for the first time with a new chemical entity. Of 33 reports of such suspected adverse reactions, validity was satisfactorily established in 14 cases on the basis of rechallenge, predictability from known pharmacology, or the unique nature of the reaction. Of the remaining 19 reports, further verification still has not been satisfactorily established in 12. Seven of these possible false alarms were haematological reactions.Although 35 of the 47 anecdotal reports were clearly correct, of the 19 reports that were not reasonably validated at the time of the report, only seven were subsequently verified. This suggests that agencies monitoring adverse drug reactions should adopt criteria for assessing the validity of first reports of suspected adverse reactions. Such criteria should include: reactions on rechallenge, a pharmacological basis for the adverse reaction, immediate acute reactions, local reactions at the site of administration, reactions with a new route of administration of a drug known to provoke such reactions by another route, and the repeated occurrence of very rare events.

摘要

相似文献

1
Validity of anecdotal reports of suspected adverse drug reactions: the problem of false alarms.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Jan 23;284(6311):249-52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6311.249.
4
Toward standardized reporting of drug interactions: the READI checklist for anecdotal reports.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015;8(4):399-409. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2015.1049598. Epub 2015 May 27.
7
Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions--systematic literature survey of follow-up.
BMJ. 2006 Feb 11;332(7537):335-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38701.399942.63. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
8
Unity from diversity: the evidential use of anecdotal reports of adverse drug reactions and interactions.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2005 Apr;11(2):195-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00527.x.
9
Quality of case reports of adverse drug reactions with psychotropic drugs: a 25-year review.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2013 Sep;28(5):413-20. doi: 10.1002/hup.2329. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
10
Identification of adverse reactions to new drugs. IV--Verification of suspected adverse reactions.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Feb 12;286(6364):544-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6364.544.

引用本文的文献

2
The case for case reports.
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2014 Oct;5(4):413-5. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.142480.
3
Grapefruit-medication interactions.
CMAJ. 2013 Apr 2;185(6):507. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.113-2109.
6
Signal detection: historical background.
Drug Saf. 2007;30(7):607-9. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730070-00006.
9
Case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions--systematic literature survey of follow-up.
BMJ. 2006 Feb 11;332(7537):335-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38701.399942.63. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
10
Clarification of terminology in drug safety.
Drug Saf. 2005;28(10):851-70. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528100-00003.

本文引用的文献

1
CARCINOMA AND HYDRALAZINE TOXICITY IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT HYPERTENSION.
JAMA. 1963 Dec 14;186:1020-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.63710110022018a.
2
BRAIN DAMAGE DUE TO PENICILLIN.
JAMA. 1963 Dec 7;186:899-902. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03710100037008.
3
ORAL NEOMYCIN: A POSSIBLE ANAESTHETIC HAZARD.
Br Med J. 1963 Nov 2;2(5365):1109-10.
4
EXPERIMENTAL CLINIC FOR PREVENTING CHRONIC BRONCHITIS.
Br Med J. 1963 Nov 2;2(5365):1088-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5365.1088.
5
HEMOLYTIC REACTION AFTER NOVOBIOCIN THERAPY.
N Engl J Med. 1963 Oct 31;269:966. doi: 10.1056/nejm196310312691808.
6
TRANSIENT MYOPIA DUE TO TETRACYCLINE.
JAMA. 1963 Oct 5;186:69-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.63710010026022a.
7
PSORIASIS FOLLOWING ADMINISTRATION OF ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS.
JAMA. 1963 Sep 28;185:1044. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060130062022.
9
AGRANULOCYTOSIS DURING ADMINISTRATION OF "ATROMID".
Br Med J. 1963 Aug 31;2(5356):543-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5356.543.
10
Agranulocytosis secondary to chlorthlidone therapy. Report of a case.
JAMA. 1963 Apr 27;184:310-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.73700170031018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验