Venning G R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Feb 12;286(6364):544-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6364.544.
The verification processes were assessed for 18 important adverse drug reactions. Verification when achieved by formal studies was not obtained through cohort studies such as postmarketing surveillance or other follow up of drug users but through case-control studies or a similar disease orientated approach. When not achieved in this way the most useful aspects of uncontrolled studies were rechallenge and dose-response data. Analysis of the data and of the characteristics of different methods of verification suggested that there were four approaches to earlier discovery. (1) The best system seemed to be some form of record linkage, capable of providing at the same time data on incidence of adverse reactions and on prevalence of drug usage in patients with disease suspected of being drug induced. Until such a system can be established the relative efficacy of alternative approaches appears to be (2) review of all published first alerts, with prompt initiation of case-control or disease orientated studies for verification, (3) postmarketing surveillance of cohorts of drug users, and (4) voluntary reporting systems.
对18种重要的药物不良反应的验证过程进行了评估。通过正式研究实现的验证并非通过队列研究(如上市后监测或对药物使用者的其他随访)获得,而是通过病例对照研究或类似的以疾病为导向的方法获得。当无法通过这种方式实现验证时,非对照研究中最有用的方面是再激发和剂量反应数据。对数据以及不同验证方法的特征进行分析表明,有四种方法可用于早期发现。(1)最佳系统似乎是某种形式的记录链接,能够同时提供疑似药物引起疾病患者的不良反应发生率数据和药物使用流行率数据。在建立这样一个系统之前,替代方法的相对有效性似乎是(2)审查所有已发表的首次警报,并迅速启动病例对照研究或疾病导向研究进行验证,(3)对药物使用者队列进行上市后监测,以及(4)自愿报告系统。