Banzett R, Strohl K, Geffroy B, Mead J
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981 Sep;51(3):660-4. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1981.51.3.660.
Inspiratory muscle activity increases when lung volume is increased by continuous positive-pressure breathing in conscious human subjects (Green et al., Respir. Physiol. 35: 283-300, 1978). Because end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) does not change, these increases have not been attributed to chemoreflexes. However, continuous positive-pressure breathing at 20 cmH2O influences the end-tidal to arterial CO2 pressure differences (Folkow and Pappenheimer, J. Appl. Physiol. 8: 102-110, 1955). We have compared PETCO2 with arterial CO2 pressure (PaCO2). We have compared PETCO2 with arterial CO2 pressure (PaCO2) in healthy human subjects exposed to continuous positive airway pressure (10 cmH2O) or continuous negative pressure around the torso (-15 cmH2O) sufficient to increase mean lung volume by about 650 ml. The difference between PETCO2 and PaCO2 was not decreased, and we conclude that PETCO2 is a valid measure of chemical drive to ventilation in such circumstances. We observed substantial increases in respiratory muscle electromyograms during pressure breathing as seen previously and conclude this response must originate by proprioception. On average, the compensation of tidal volume thus afforded was complete, but the wide variability of individual responses suggests that there was a large cerebral cortical component in the responses seen here.
在清醒的人类受试者中,通过持续正压通气增加肺容积时,吸气肌活动会增强(格林等人,《呼吸生理学》35: 283 - 300, 1978)。由于呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)没有变化,这些增加并非归因于化学反射。然而,20 cmH2O的持续正压通气会影响呼气末与动脉二氧化碳分压的差值(福尔科夫和帕彭海默,《应用生理学杂志》8: 102 - 110, 1955)。我们比较了PETCO2与动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)。我们在健康人类受试者中比较了PETCO2与动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2),这些受试者接受持续气道正压(10 cmH2O)或躯干周围持续负压(-15 cmH2O),足以使平均肺容积增加约650 ml。PETCO2与PaCO2之间的差异并未减小,我们得出结论,在这种情况下,PETCO2是通气化学驱动的有效指标。我们观察到压力呼吸期间呼吸肌肌电图大幅增加,正如之前所见到的那样,并得出该反应必定起源于本体感受的结论。平均而言,由此产生的潮气量补偿是完全的,但个体反应的广泛变异性表明这里观察到的反应中存在很大的大脑皮质成分。