Hahn G
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol. 1981 Nov;250(4):431-45.
In accordance with previous papers published within a series of publications which describe the results obtained from the Central Laboratory for Streptococcal Research in Kiel (1. Survey, 2. Mastitis-Streptococci) the group of Enterococci is discussed herewith. On the basis of more than 6000 strains which are stored in our databank including all biological characteristics, the distribution of the cultural, biochemical and serological parameters is listed in percentages, and the usefulness and reliability for the identification of the enterococcal group and also the differentiation of particular species is discussed. The results are tabulated for every single species and additionally, for serologic-positive and negative strains. For example, it can be shown that a third of all Str. faecium strains are motile, that lack of growth at 45 degrees C varies between 1.1% and 31.3% and that lack of serological reaction with group D-serum between 0.9% and 70%. In a comprehensive table and flow diagram these figures result in a proposal for a simple but sufficient identification procedure on different stages (enterococci, faecalis- or faecium-group, single species) depending on the individual requirements. With regard to the incidence of enterococci in man and animals, which was presented in the first paper, the organ sources of the different species are compared now. Apart from some interesting findings it can be stated that a typical predominance of the faecalis and faecium-group resp. in man or animals cannot be confirmed. But there seems to be a relation between the species and the organ source. For example, in humans the faecium-group predominates in the respiratory tract, but in the urogenital tract the presence of Str. faecalis is seven times higher than the faecium-group. The above results may also be of interest for ecological reasons and may be important for the pathogenesis and epidemiology of this streptococcal group.
根据此前发表在一系列出版物中的论文(这些论文描述了基尔链球菌研究中心实验室所取得的结果,第一篇综述,第二篇乳腺炎链球菌),本文对肠球菌属进行了讨论。基于存储在我们数据库中的6000多株菌株的所有生物学特性,以百分比形式列出了培养、生化和血清学参数的分布情况,并讨论了这些参数在鉴定肠球菌属以及区分特定菌种方面的实用性和可靠性。对每个单一菌种以及血清学阳性和阴性菌株的结果都进行了列表。例如,可以看出所有屎肠球菌菌株中有三分之一具有运动性,在45摄氏度下不生长的比例在1.1%至31.3%之间变化,与D群血清无血清学反应的比例在0.9%至70%之间。在一个综合表格和流程图中,这些数据得出了一个根据不同需求在不同阶段(肠球菌、粪肠球菌或屎肠球菌组、单一菌种)进行简单但充分的鉴定程序的建议。关于第一篇论文中提到的人和动物体内肠球菌的发生率,现在比较了不同菌种的器官来源。除了一些有趣的发现外,可以说粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌组在人或动物体内并没有典型的优势。但菌种和器官来源之间似乎存在某种关系。例如,在人类中,屎肠球菌组在呼吸道中占优势,但在泌尿生殖道中,粪肠球菌的存在比屎肠球菌组高七倍。上述结果从生态学角度来看可能也很有趣,并且对于该链球菌组的发病机制和流行病学可能很重要。