Dronfield M W, Langman M J, Atkinson M, Balfour T W, Bell G D, Vellacott K D, Amar S S, Knapp D R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Feb 20;284(6315):545-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6315.545.
A study was conducted to find whether the higher diagnostic yield of endoscopy compared with barium radiography improves management or survival in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. A total of 1037 patients were entered into a randomised study comparing the outcomes after each investigation. The diagnostic yield in patients who underwent endoscopy was 73% (382 of 526 cases) and in those examined by radiography 55% (280 of 511 cases). A fifth of the patients in the radiology group and a tenth of those in the endoscopy group subsequently underwent the alternative investigation; in most cases, however, no additional diagnostic information was obtained. Operation rates were similar in two groups, though patients in the endoscopy group were generally operated on sooner. Mortality rates were also similar in the two groups, though postoperative mortality was higher in the endoscopy group. Endoscopy may be a more accurate means of diagnosis than radiography, but it offers no short-term benefits in management.
开展了一项研究,以确定与钡剂造影相比,内镜检查更高的诊断率是否能改善急性上消化道出血患者的治疗或生存情况。共有1037例患者进入一项随机研究,比较每次检查后的结果。接受内镜检查的患者诊断率为73%(526例中的382例),接受造影检查的患者诊断率为55%(511例中的280例)。放射学组五分之一的患者以及内镜检查组十分之一的患者随后接受了另一种检查;然而,在大多数情况下,并未获得额外的诊断信息。两组的手术率相似,不过内镜检查组的患者通常手术时间更早。两组的死亡率也相似,不过内镜检查组的术后死亡率更高。内镜检查可能是比造影更准确的诊断手段,但在治疗方面并无短期益处。