Suppr超能文献

诊断技术临床评估框架。

A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies.

作者信息

Guyatt G H, Tugwell P X, Feeny D H, Haynes R B, Drummond M

出版信息

CMAJ. 1986 Mar 15;134(6):587-94.

Abstract

Most new diagnostic technologies have not been adequately assessed to determine whether their application improves health. Comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic technologies includes establishing technologic capability and determining the range of possible uses, diagnostic accuracy, impact on the health care provider, therapeutic impact and impact on patient outcome. Guidelines to determine whether each of these criteria have been met adequately are presented. Diagnostic technologies should be disseminated only if they are less expensive, produce fewer untoward effects and are at least as accurate as existing methods, if they eliminate the need for other investigations without loss of accuracy, or if they lead to institution of effective therapy. Establishing patient benefit often requires a randomized controlled trial in which patients receive the new test or an alternative diagnostic strategy. Other study designs are logistically less difficult but may not provide accurate assessment of benefit. Rigorous assessment of diagnostic technologies is needed for efficient use of health care resources.

摘要

大多数新的诊断技术尚未得到充分评估,以确定其应用是否能改善健康状况。对诊断技术的全面评估包括确定技术能力、确定可能的使用范围、诊断准确性、对医疗服务提供者的影响、治疗影响以及对患者预后的影响。文中给出了判断这些标准是否得到充分满足的指南。只有当诊断技术成本更低、产生的不良影响更少且至少与现有方法一样准确,或者在不损失准确性的情况下无需进行其他检查,或者能导致采取有效治疗措施时,才应推广应用。确定患者是否受益通常需要进行随机对照试验,让患者接受新的检测或替代诊断策略。其他研究设计在后勤方面难度较小,但可能无法准确评估受益情况。为了有效利用医疗资源,需要对诊断技术进行严格评估。

相似文献

4
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

3
A methodology for projecting the return on investment of training technologies.一种培训技术投资回报预测方法。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Jan 2;36(1):125-136. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2050164. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
Certainty of evidence, why?证据的确凿性,为什么?
J Bras Pneumol. 2023 Aug 7;49(4):e20230167. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230167. eCollection 2023.
7
Rethinking PICO in the Machine Learning Era: ML-PICO.重新思考机器学习时代的 PICO:ML-PICO。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Mar;12(2):407-416. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729752. Epub 2021 May 19.

本文引用的文献

3
Ordering patterns and clinical impact of cardiovascular nuclear medicine procedures.
Circulation. 1980 Oct;62(4):680-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.62.4.680.
4
Psychologically mediated effects of diagnostic tests.
Ann Intern Med. 1981 Dec;95(6):680-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-95-6-680.
5
The value of antenatal cardiotocography in the management of high-risk pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Sep;89(9):716-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05097.x.
7
Clinical utility and management impact of M-mode echocardiography.
Am J Med. 1983 Jul;75(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91167-1.
8
Metadiagnosis. An epistemologic model of clinical judgment.
Am J Med. 1983 Jul;75(1):129-37. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91176-2.
10
Policy formulation and technology assessment.政策制定与技术评估。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1981 Summer;59(3):445-79.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验