Guyatt G H, Tugwell P X, Feeny D H, Haynes R B, Drummond M
CMAJ. 1986 Mar 15;134(6):587-94.
Most new diagnostic technologies have not been adequately assessed to determine whether their application improves health. Comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic technologies includes establishing technologic capability and determining the range of possible uses, diagnostic accuracy, impact on the health care provider, therapeutic impact and impact on patient outcome. Guidelines to determine whether each of these criteria have been met adequately are presented. Diagnostic technologies should be disseminated only if they are less expensive, produce fewer untoward effects and are at least as accurate as existing methods, if they eliminate the need for other investigations without loss of accuracy, or if they lead to institution of effective therapy. Establishing patient benefit often requires a randomized controlled trial in which patients receive the new test or an alternative diagnostic strategy. Other study designs are logistically less difficult but may not provide accurate assessment of benefit. Rigorous assessment of diagnostic technologies is needed for efficient use of health care resources.
大多数新的诊断技术尚未得到充分评估,以确定其应用是否能改善健康状况。对诊断技术的全面评估包括确定技术能力、确定可能的使用范围、诊断准确性、对医疗服务提供者的影响、治疗影响以及对患者预后的影响。文中给出了判断这些标准是否得到充分满足的指南。只有当诊断技术成本更低、产生的不良影响更少且至少与现有方法一样准确,或者在不损失准确性的情况下无需进行其他检查,或者能导致采取有效治疗措施时,才应推广应用。确定患者是否受益通常需要进行随机对照试验,让患者接受新的检测或替代诊断策略。其他研究设计在后勤方面难度较小,但可能无法准确评估受益情况。为了有效利用医疗资源,需要对诊断技术进行严格评估。