Walser H, Friedli W, Glinz W
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1981 Dec;12(4):198-204.
To evaluate the prognostic power of a single EEG-record, the recordings of 50 patients with posttraumatic coma performed within 48 hours after the injury were compared with the outcome after 6 months. A 5-point scale comprising 2 EEG-patterns being notorious for their dismal prognostic significance (suppression bursts, alpha-coma) and changes of vigilance were used as a mean of visual assessment of the recordings. In 24 out of the 28 patients with a bad outcome, the EEG had shown the patterns of category I, II and III (suppression bursts, alpha coma, no changes of vigilance). Of the 22 patients with a good outcome, the EEG had been classified as IV or V (clearly discernible changes of vigilance, sleep patterns). Further findings of particular dismal prognostic significance were focal epileptic discharges, as 9 out of the 11 patients with this EEG pattern had not survived the posttraumatic coma for more than 6 months.
为评估单次脑电图记录的预后预测能力,将50例创伤后昏迷患者在受伤后48小时内进行的脑电图记录与6个月后的预后进行比较。采用一个5分制量表,该量表包括2种因预后意义不佳而闻名的脑电图模式(爆发抑制、α昏迷)以及警觉性变化,以此作为对脑电图记录进行视觉评估的方法。在28例预后不良的患者中,有24例脑电图显示为I、II和III类模式(爆发抑制、α昏迷、警觉性无变化)。在22例预后良好的患者中,脑电图被归类为IV或V类(警觉性有明显可辨别的变化、睡眠模式)。具有特别不良预后意义的进一步发现是局灶性癫痫放电,因为在11例有这种脑电图模式的患者中,有9例在创伤后昏迷6个月以上未能存活。