Green C E, Rice D W, Hsieh D P, Byard J L
Food Chem Toxicol. 1982 Feb;20(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(82)80009-4.
Both aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and a hydroxylated metabolite, aflatoxin M1 (AFM1), were potent cytotoxins and genotoxins to primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. However, AFB1 stimulated the release of lactate dehydrogenase into the culture medium and the loss of viable cells from the monolayer at lower doses than did AFM1. The lowest toxic doses of AFB1 and AFM1 were 0.05-01 and 0.6 microgram/culture, respectively. Genotoxicity, determined by an assay for stimulation of DNA repair, was apparent at lower doses than was cytotoxicity. AFB1 was again more potent than AFM1, stimulating DNA repair at 0.025 microgram/culture, compared to the lowest genotoxic dose of AFM1 of 0.05 microgram/culture. At higher doses (1.2-2.4 microgram/culture) the responses due to both aflatoxins in the cytotoxicity and DNA-repair assays were approximately equal. The metabolism of a low dose (c. 0.17 microgram/culture) of [14C]AFB1 and [3H]AFM1 by cultured hepatocytes differed significantly. After 1 hr, 50% of the [14C]AFB1 remained unchanged in the culture medium, whereas about 18 hr were required for the same amount of [3H]AFM1 metabolism to occur [14C]AFB1 was metabolized to AFM1, to polar metabolites recovered in the aqueous phase after chloroform extraction, and to metabolites covalently bound to hepatocyte macromolecules. [3H]AFM1 was also metabolized to polar metabolites and to forms bound to macromolecules. The degree of covalent binding of the aflatoxins correlated with their cytotoxicity and genotoxicity at lower doses. After a 24-hr incubation, 12.5% of the dose of [14C]AFB1 was covalently bound to macromolecules compared to 1.5% of [3H]AFM1. Although AFM1 was less potent than AFB1 in cytotoxicity, DNA-repair and covalent-binding assays using primary cultures of hepatocytes, AFM1 was still active at relatively low doses and therefore is probably a potent hepatotoxin in vivo.
黄曲霉毒素B1(AFB1)及其羟基化代谢产物黄曲霉毒素M1(AFM1)对大鼠肝细胞原代培养物均具有强细胞毒素和基因毒素作用。然而,与AFM1相比,AFB1在更低剂量时就能刺激乳酸脱氢酶释放到培养基中,并导致单层培养细胞中活细胞数量减少。AFB1和AFM1的最低毒性剂量分别为0.05 - 0.1微克/培养物和0.6微克/培养物。通过DNA修复刺激试验测定的基因毒性在比细胞毒性更低的剂量下就很明显。AFB1再次比AFM1更具效力,AFB1在0.025微克/培养物时就能刺激DNA修复,而AFM1的最低基因毒性剂量为0.05微克/培养物。在更高剂量(1.2 - 2.4微克/培养物)时,两种黄曲霉毒素在细胞毒性和DNA修复试验中的反应大致相同。培养的肝细胞对低剂量(约0.17微克/培养物)的[14C]AFB1和[3H]AFM1的代谢存在显著差异。1小时后,培养基中50%的[14C]AFB1未发生变化,而相同量的[3H]AFM1代谢发生大约需要18小时。[14C]AFB1被代谢为AFM1、氯仿萃取后水相中回收的极性代谢产物以及与肝细胞大分子共价结合的代谢产物。[3H]AFM1也被代谢为极性代谢产物和与大分子结合的形式。在较低剂量下,黄曲霉毒素的共价结合程度与其细胞毒性和基因毒性相关。孵育24小时后,[14C]AFB1剂量的12.5%与大分子共价结合,而[3H]AFM1为1.5%。尽管在使用肝细胞原代培养物进行的细胞毒性、DNA修复和共价结合试验中,AFM1的效力低于AFB1,但AFM1在相对较低剂量时仍具有活性,因此可能是体内一种强效肝毒素。