Greenberg J A, Kropf R
Health Serv Res. 1982 Spring;17(1):45-59.
A case-mix strategy was used with hospital chart-abstract data from New Jersey to estimate the hypothetical savings in the cost of Cardiac Care Unit (CCU) care in the state that would result from the state-wide implementation of the following five policies: limiting uncomplicated Acute-Myocardial Infraction (AMI) patients to seven days of hospitalization; treating uncomplicated AMI patients at home; using the CCU only for diagnoses for which it is widely accepted as effective; tightening CCU admission criteria; and tightening CCU discharge criteria. The selection of these policies was based on a review of the CCU literature and on empirical data from the New Jersey CCU system. The case-mix strategy involved; the creation and categorization of a list of diagnoses which are eligible for CCU treatment; the selection of a sample of hospitals for study; and the estimation of the savings which would result from the implementation of the hypothetical CCU policies throughout the state. The estimated savings were substantial compared to the total cost of CCU care in New Jersey, stressing the need for further investigation of the cost-effectiveness of current CCU treatment practices. In addition, the case-mix method used in this study is recommended for bringing considerations of the cost-effectiveness of clinical practice into public policy debates on the regulation of medical services.
采用病例组合策略,利用新泽西州医院病历摘要数据,估算该州在全州实施以下五项政策后,心脏重症监护病房(CCU)护理成本的假设性节省情况:将无并发症的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者住院时间限制在七天;在家治疗无并发症的AMI患者;仅将CCU用于其被广泛认为有效的诊断;收紧CCU入院标准;以及收紧CCU出院标准。这些政策的选择基于对CCU文献的回顾以及新泽西州CCU系统的实证数据。病例组合策略包括:创建并分类符合CCU治疗条件的诊断列表;选择样本医院进行研究;以及估算在全州实施假设的CCU政策所带来的节省。与新泽西州CCU护理的总成本相比,估算的节省金额相当可观,这凸显了进一步研究当前CCU治疗实践成本效益的必要性。此外,本研究中使用的病例组合方法建议用于将临床实践成本效益的考量纳入医疗服务监管的公共政策辩论中。