Young W W, Swinkola R B, Zorn D M
Med Care. 1982 May;20(5):501-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198205000-00006.
This paper describes the design and preliminary results of research being conducted by Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania to measure hospital case mix. The model of patient management used in this research interrelates symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Analyses of detailed patient data have indicated that patient classifications that are based on discharge diagnosis, singly or in combination with other variables such as secondary or multiple diagnoses, procedure and age, do not necessarily result in patient categories that require similar management or similar hospital services. Patients who are clinically similar, and even the same patient, can have a number of diverse, but appropriate, reasons for being in the hospital, and their use of hospital resources in each hospital episode will differ accordingly. The implications of including all reasons for hospitalizing these patients under the same rubric are clear: the resultant category would not be homogeneous with respect to resource use or hospital costs. Any case-mix index constructed using such categories as its basis could not only be misleading, but could also be financially damaging or extremely profitable to selected hospitals if used in hospital reimbursement. Both the model presented and preliminary analysis will be useful in designing other strategies for research and application in the area of case mix.
本文描述了宾夕法尼亚西部蓝十字公司为衡量医院病例组合而开展的研究的设计及初步结果。本研究中使用的患者管理模型将症状、诊断和治疗相互关联起来。对详细患者数据的分析表明,基于出院诊断单独或与其他变量(如次要或多重诊断、手术和年龄)相结合的患者分类,不一定会产生需要相似管理或相似医院服务的患者类别。临床上相似的患者,甚至是同一患者,可能因多种不同但合理的原因住院,且他们在每次住院期间对医院资源的使用也会相应不同。将这些患者所有的住院原因归为同一类别,其影响是显而易见的:就资源使用或医院成本而言,最终的类别将不是同质的。任何以这类类别为基础构建的病例组合指数不仅可能具有误导性,而且如果用于医院报销,对某些医院来说可能在财务上造成损害或带来极高利润。所提出的模型和初步分析对于设计病例组合领域的其他研究及应用策略都将是有用的。