Hebel J R, Kessler I I, Mabuchi K, McCarter R J
JAMA. 1982 Dec 17;248(23):3131-5.
This article discusses an analytical approach for integrating hospital death rates. A study of patient mortality in four hospitals in a large metropolitan areas demonstrates the principles underlying this approach. One hospital, which experienced an annual crude death rate almost twice that of the other three, was suspected of providing an inferior quality of care. Case-mix differences among the hospitals introduced a serious bias, however, and were later taken into account. The patients' primary diagnosis was found to be the most important case-mix variable, with a potential for biasing death rate comparisons. After readjustment for case mix, the maximum difference in death rates among the four hospitals was reduced from 19 to four deaths per 1,000 patients. Further analysis of diagnosis-specific mortality supported the thesis that the observed mortality excess was largely attributable to patient referral patterns in the community.
本文讨论了一种整合医院死亡率的分析方法。对一个大都市地区四家医院的患者死亡率进行的一项研究证明了该方法背后的原理。其中一家医院的年粗死亡率几乎是其他三家医院的两倍,人们怀疑该医院提供的护理质量较差。然而,医院之间的病例组合差异引入了严重的偏差,后来对此进行了考虑。研究发现患者的主要诊断是最重要的病例组合变量,有可能使死亡率比较产生偏差。在对病例组合进行重新调整后,四家医院死亡率的最大差异从每1000名患者19例死亡降至4例死亡。对特定诊断死亡率的进一步分析支持了以下论点,即观察到的死亡率过高主要归因于社区中的患者转诊模式。