North W R, Stirling Y, Meade T W
Thromb Haemost. 1982 Dec 27;48(3):270-3.
There are no generally accepted units for clotting factors except factor VIII. Results are usually expressed as percentages of the standards used in the assays and standards vary in their potency. Over a six year period, factors V, VII and VIII were measured in over 3000 participants in the Northwick Park Heart Study. Six different standards had to be used. For comparative purposes, all results were expressed in terms of the first standard (71/11). This paper describes how appropriate conversion values were derived. Three different methods were compared. One consisted of the assay of each standard against its replacement. Another was based on the use of a reference plasma spanning the use of two successive standards. The third was a population-based, or epidemiological method using the data from all the participants in the study. This method is based on the assumption that results would be the same in comparable groups of study participants. In order to ensure comparability, personal characteristics which affect clotting factor levels, such as age and degree of obesity, were taken into account. The three methods gave similar results but the population method was, in general, the most satisfactory for factor VIII as well as factors V and VII, and has been adopted for routine use.
除了因子VIII外,凝血因子没有普遍接受的单位。结果通常表示为检测中所用标准品的百分比,且标准品的效价各不相同。在六年时间里,对诺斯威克公园心脏研究中的3000多名参与者进行了因子V、VII和VIII的检测。不得不使用六种不同的标准品。为了便于比较,所有结果均以第一种标准品(71/11)表示。本文描述了如何得出合适的换算值。比较了三种不同的方法。一种方法是对每种标准品与其替代物进行检测。另一种方法基于使用跨越两种连续标准品使用的参考血浆。第三种方法是基于人群的方法,即流行病学方法,使用研究中所有参与者的数据。该方法基于这样的假设,即在可比的研究参与者组中结果是相同的。为了确保可比性,考虑了影响凝血因子水平的个人特征,如年龄和肥胖程度。这三种方法得出了相似的结果,但总体而言,人群方法对因子VIII以及因子V和VII来说是最令人满意的,并且已被用于常规检测。