Barrowcliffe Trevor W, Raut Sanjeev, Sands Dawn, Hubbard Anthony R
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Potters Bar, United Kingdom.
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002 Jun;28(3):247-56. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32658.
Factor VIII (FVIII) is assayed by one-stage and two-stage clotting methods and by chromogenic methods, although the chromogenic method has largely replaced the two-stage clotting assay. Clinical plasma samples are assayed mostly by one-stage assays, but most manufacturers of concentrates use the chromogenic method, which is more precise and is the reference method of the European Pharmacopoeia and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). For most plasma-derived concentrates, assays against the World Health Organization (WHO) concentrate standard give similar results with the one-stage and chromogenic methods, but for products produced by the "method M" monoclonal antibody process, the one-stage potency is 25 to 30% higher than the chromogenic potency. For full-length recombinant products assayed against a plasma-derived concentrate standard, one-stage potencies are about 10% lower than chromogenic potencies, but for the B-domain deleted recombinant product ReFacto, the discrepancy is larger-from 20 to 50%. These discrepancies emphasize the need for an international methodology for labeling of concentrates. In ex vivo assays of hemophilic plasmas after infusion of concentrates, large discrepancies are found among laboratories and with different assay methods when a plasma standard is used. In most studies, the chromogenic potencies are higher than the one-stage potencies, and the discrepancy is highest for recombinant products. This discrepancy can be largely eliminated by the use of concentrate standards, diluted in FVIII-deficient plasma, to assay postinfusion plasma samples.
因子VIII(FVIII)通过一期和二期凝血方法以及发色底物法进行检测,尽管发色底物法已在很大程度上取代了二期凝血检测法。临床血浆样本大多通过一期检测法进行检测,但大多数浓缩物制造商使用发色底物法,该方法更为精确,是欧洲药典和国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)的参考方法。对于大多数血浆源性浓缩物,采用世界卫生组织(WHO)浓缩物标准进行检测时,一期法和发色底物法得出的结果相似,但对于采用“方法M”单克隆抗体工艺生产的产品,一期效力比发色底物法效力高25%至30%。对于参照血浆源性浓缩物标准进行检测的全长重组产品,一期效力比发色底物法效力低约10%,但对于B结构域缺失的重组产品ReFacto,差异更大——为20%至50%。这些差异凸显了制定浓缩物标签国际方法的必要性。在输注浓缩物后对血友病血浆进行的体外检测中,当使用血浆标准品时,各实验室之间以及不同检测方法之间存在很大差异。在大多数研究中,发色底物法效力高于一期法效力,且重组产品的差异最大。通过使用在FVIII缺乏血浆中稀释的浓缩物标准品来检测输注后血浆样本,这种差异在很大程度上可以消除。