Suppr超能文献

肾积脓的治疗:一项对比研究。

Treatment of pyonephrosis: a comparative study.

作者信息

Jimenez J F, Lopez Pacios M A, Llamazares G, Conejero J, Sole-Balcells F

出版信息

J Urol. 1978 Sep;120(3):287-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57139-6.

Abstract

Our study is a comparison of treatments used for 97 patients with pyonephrosis. The patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) cases in which a primary nephrectomy was done, 2) cases in which nephrectomy was secondary to drainage through a nephrostomy and 3) cases in which nephrectomy was secondary to drainage through a translumbar percutaneous puncture with an Ingram catheter indwelling. Patients in whom nephrostomy and puncture were used had the highest percentage of complications, while primary nephrectomy produced the best results. Therefore, we believe that primary nephrectomy is the procedure of choice, using drainage through a puncture only when the general status of the patient does not permit primary nephrectomy.

摘要

我们的研究对97例肾积脓患者所采用的治疗方法进行了比较。患者被分为3组:1)接受一期肾切除术的病例;2)在经肾造瘘引流后接受肾切除术的病例;3)在经英格拉姆导管留置的经腰段经皮穿刺引流后接受肾切除术的病例。采用肾造瘘和穿刺的患者并发症发生率最高,而一期肾切除术效果最佳。因此,我们认为一期肾切除术是首选术式,仅在患者一般状况不允许进行一期肾切除术时才采用穿刺引流。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验