Ben-Arie O, George G C, Hirschowitz J
S Afr Med J. 1983 Feb 12;63(7):241-3.
Fifty alcoholic drunken drivers receiving treatment as part of a suspended sentence were studied to assess the efficacy of compulsory treatment. Twenty-six showed improvement in drinking behaviour, 12 did not co-operate and were referred back to court, 7 were re-arrested on further charges of drunken driving and 4 were committed to long-term rehabilitation centres (1 patient died too early to allow for adequate follow-up). The results compare favourably with improvement in alcoholics treated voluntarily. When regarded as their own controls, patients who had previously been arrested for drunken driving but had not been referred for treatment showed considerable improvement in their behaviour, as did patients who had had previous unsuccessful voluntary treatment. This programme appears to be worth while, at least for the duration of the suspended sentence. It also encourages early identification of alcoholics and their referral for treatment.
对五十名作为缓刑一部分接受治疗的醉酒驾车者进行了研究,以评估强制治疗的效果。二十六人饮酒行为有所改善,十二人不配合并被送回法庭,七人因再次被控醉酒驾车而再次被捕,四人被送往长期康复中心(一名患者过早死亡,无法进行充分随访)。这些结果与自愿接受治疗的酗酒者的改善情况相比很有利。当将他们自身作为对照时,之前因醉酒驾车被捕但未被转诊接受治疗的患者行为有了显著改善,之前自愿治疗未成功的患者也是如此。至少在缓刑期间,这个项目似乎是值得的。它还鼓励尽早识别酗酒者并将他们转诊接受治疗。