Samra S K, Pandit U A, Pandit S K, Kothary S P
Can Anaesth Soc J. 1983 Jan;30(1):48-52. doi: 10.1007/BF03007716.
The effect of halothane and enflurane on changes in heart rate during reversal of neuromuscular block was compared in 48 adult patients. Premedication and anaesthetic technique were standardized. Either halothane or enflurane was the primary anaesthetic while pancuronium was used in all patients to achieve muscle relaxation. Ventilation was mechanically controlled and PaCO2 was between 30-40 mmHg. The neuromuscular block was reversed by an intravenous injection of atropine 1.2 mg and neostigmine 2.5 mg, given either separately or simultaneously, in different patient subgroups. Heart rate changes were significantly different between the halothane and enflurane groups. In general, reversal of neuromuscular block was accompanied by less fluctuations in heart rate after enflurane as compared to halothane anaesthesia. Simultaneous injection of atropine and neostigmine modified the tachycardiac response in the halothane sub-group only. Our observations suggest that use of enflurane offers an advantage over halothane in those patients in whom rapid fluctuations in heart rate during reversal of neuromuscular block may be dangerous.
在48例成年患者中比较了氟烷和恩氟烷对神经肌肉阻滞逆转过程中心率变化的影响。术前用药和麻醉技术均标准化。所有患者均使用泮库溴铵实现肌肉松弛,氟烷或恩氟烷作为主要麻醉剂。机械控制通气,使动脉血二氧化碳分压维持在30 - 40 mmHg。在不同患者亚组中,通过静脉注射1.2 mg阿托品和2.5 mg新斯的明单独或同时给药来逆转神经肌肉阻滞。氟烷组和恩氟烷组的心率变化有显著差异。总体而言,与氟烷麻醉相比,恩氟烷麻醉后神经肌肉阻滞逆转时心率波动较小。仅在氟烷亚组中,同时注射阿托品和新斯的明可改变心动过速反应。我们的观察结果表明,对于那些神经肌肉阻滞逆转过程中心率快速波动可能有危险的患者,使用恩氟烷比氟烷更具优势。