• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理性行为量表在临床人群中的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Rational Behavior Inventory with a clinical population.

作者信息

Shorkey C T, Sutton-Simon K

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1983 Jan;39(1):34-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198301)39:1<34::aid-jclp2270390107>3.0.co;2-g.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(198301)39:1<34::aid-jclp2270390107>3.0.co;2-g
PMID:6826752
Abstract

Administered to mental health outpatients (N = 75) who were receiving Psychotherapy the Rational Behavior Inventory as well as several other scales of psychological adjustment prior to their first therapy session. Their therapists also completed several of these scales on their clients. This procedure was repeated for a subsample upon termination of treatment. Correlations were computed among measures, and t-tests were conducted between pre- and posttreatment scores. Significant correlations were found between all measures in the expected directions, and significant pre- to post-scale differences were identified consistent with the expected effects of treatment. These results are interpreted as initial evidence for the Rational Behavior Inventory's reliability and validity with a clinical group. Future research is suggested to examine the Rational Behavior Inventory's relationship to other measures of cognitive dysfunction.

摘要

该研究针对75名接受心理治疗的心理健康门诊患者进行。在首次治疗前,这些患者接受了理性行为量表以及其他几种心理调适量表的测试。他们的治疗师也对其客户完成了其中的几种量表测试。在治疗结束时,对一个子样本重复了这一过程。计算了各项测量指标之间的相关性,并对治疗前和治疗后的分数进行了t检验。在预期方向上,所有测量指标之间都发现了显著的相关性,并且确定了量表前后的显著差异,与预期的治疗效果一致。这些结果被解释为理性行为量表在临床群体中可靠性和有效性的初步证据。建议未来的研究考察理性行为量表与其他认知功能障碍测量指标之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Rational Behavior Inventory with a clinical population.理性行为量表在临床人群中的信度和效度
J Clin Psychol. 1983 Jan;39(1):34-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198301)39:1<34::aid-jclp2270390107>3.0.co;2-g.
2
The Psychological Screening Inventory's usefulness as a screening instrument for adolescent inpatients.
J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):262-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_7.
3
Clinical construct validity of the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory (HPSI).
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;48(5):627-33. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199209)48:5<627::aid-jclp2270480508>3.0.co;2-9.
4
Effect of rational and irrational statements on intensity and 'inappropriateness' of emotional distress and irrational beliefs in psychotherapy patients.理性与非理性陈述对心理治疗患者情绪困扰强度及“不适当性”和非理性信念的影响。
Br J Clin Psychol. 1993 Sep;32(3):319-25. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1993.tb01062.x.
5
[Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the coping inventory for stressful situations (CISS): a contribution to the cross-cultural studies of coping].压力情境应对量表(CISS)日文版的信效度:对应对方式跨文化研究的贡献
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1993;95(8):602-20.
6
Personal growth in mothers: examination of the suitability of the posttraumatic growth inventory as a measurement tool.母亲的个人成长:创伤后成长量表作为一种测量工具的适用性检验。
Women Health. 2011 Aug 31;51(6):604-22. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2011.614324.
7
An inventory to assess psychopathology of mentally retarded adults.一份评估成年智障者精神病理学的量表。
Am J Ment Defic. 1985 Mar;89(5):459-66.
8
Personality and mental health treatment: Traits as predictors of presentation, usage, and outcome.人格与心理健康治疗:特质作为表现、使用和结果的预测因子。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jul;30(7):967-977. doi: 10.1037/pas0000551. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Nine standardized scales for evaluating treatment outcome in a mental health clinic.
J Clin Psychol. 1983 Nov;39(6):939-50. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198311)39:6<939::aid-jclp2270390620>3.0.co;2-c.
10
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Emotional Intelligence Scale among college students and psychiatric outpatients.大学生和精神科门诊患者中日语版情绪智力量表的效度和信度。
Psychol Rep. 2001 Dec;89(3):625-32. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.89.3.625.