Ross D G, Ross W B, Schreiner D E, Heaton W A
Transfusion. 1983 Jan-Feb;23(1):75-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1983.23183147314.x.
Following a change from earstick to fingerstick hemoglobin estimations, donor deferrals increased from 8.8% to 13.6%. Coincident with the change to fingersticks, hematocrit measurement with miniature centrifuges was begun as the reference method to verify donor rejection by the copper sulfate test. A study of 525 donors deferred for fingerstick hematocrits showed that 46.7% were deferred inappropriately as determined by venous hematocrit measurements. The difference between fingerstick and venous hematocrits persisted even after an intensive staff inservice on technique. In further studies, no significant difference was found between venous and fingerstick hematocrits measured on the same centrifuge, but there was a significant difference between measurements on the miniature centrifuges versus a standard laboratory microhematocrit centrifuge. This small error resulted in the loss of 3.8% of presenting donors during the study period. Hematocrit measurements have now been replaced by a fingerstick cyanmethemoglobin method.
从采用耳垂血红蛋白测定改为手指血红蛋白测定后,献血者延期率从8.8%升至13.6%。在改为手指采血的同时,开始使用微型离心机进行血细胞比容测量,作为通过硫酸铜试验验证献血者不合格的参考方法。一项对525名因手指血细胞比容而延期的献血者的研究表明,根据静脉血细胞比容测量结果,46.7%的延期是不恰当的。即使在工作人员接受了关于技术的强化在职培训后,手指血细胞比容和静脉血细胞比容之间的差异仍然存在。在进一步的研究中,在同一台离心机上测量的静脉和手指血细胞比容之间没有发现显著差异,但在微型离心机与标准实验室微量血细胞比容离心机上的测量结果之间存在显著差异。这个小误差导致在研究期间3.8%的前来献血者流失。血细胞比容测量现在已被手指氰化高铁血红蛋白法所取代。