Suppr超能文献

血浆芬太尼浓度的测定:三种方法的比较

Measurement of plasma fentanyl concentration: comparison of three methods.

作者信息

Phipps J A, Sabourin M A, Buckingham W, Strunin L

出版信息

Can Anaesth Soc J. 1983 Mar;30(2):162-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03009346.

Abstract

The measurement of plasma fentanyl concentration by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and gas liquid chromatography (GLC) using either a flame ionization detector (FID) or nitrogen/phosphorus detector (NPD) has been compared. RIA is a satisfactory but expensive method of measuring plasma fentanyl concentration. GLC using an FID is not as satisfactory as RIA, but when an NPD is used the results are equal to those of RIA. In addition, other analgesics which are chemically similar to fentanyl, such as alfentanil, may also be measured by the GLC/NPD combination using the same set of operating conditions. By contrast, an RIA method is usually specific for only one compound, and measurement of additional drugs would almost certainly necessitate the development of new assay kits for each one.

摘要

已对采用放射免疫分析法(RIA)以及使用火焰离子化检测器(FID)或氮/磷检测器(NPD)的气液色谱法(GLC)测定血浆芬太尼浓度进行了比较。放射免疫分析法是一种测定血浆芬太尼浓度的令人满意但昂贵的方法。使用火焰离子化检测器的气液色谱法不如放射免疫分析法令人满意,但使用氮/磷检测器时,结果与放射免疫分析法相当。此外,其他与芬太尼化学结构相似的镇痛药,如阿芬太尼,也可使用相同的一组操作条件通过气液色谱法/氮/磷检测器组合进行测定。相比之下,放射免疫分析法通常仅对一种化合物具有特异性,而测定其他药物几乎肯定需要为每种药物开发新的检测试剂盒。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验