Parameswaran R, Goldberg H
Chest. 1983 May;83(5):767-70. doi: 10.1378/chest.83.5.767.
This study was undertaken to test the validity of M-mode echocardiographic quantitation of pericardial effusion. M-mode estimate of the volume of pericardial effusion in 27 patients was compared with the actual volume of pericardial effusion removed during surgical pericardial drainage. The 16 two-dimensional echocardiographic studies in patients with small, moderate, and large pericardial effusions were reviewed to examine the distribution of pericardial fluid around the heart. Although there was good correlation between the echocardiographic estimate and the actual volume removed during surgery (r = 0.78), significant overestimation and underestimation were noted. Our findings suggest that the errors in the estimate could be attributed in part to difficulties in precise measurement of the epicardial and pericardial landmarks and in part to nonuniform distribution of pericardial fluid around the heart.
本研究旨在检验M型超声心动图定量心包积液的有效性。将27例患者心包积液的M型估计量与手术心包引流时实际排出的心包积液量进行比较。回顾了16例有少量、中度和大量心包积液患者的二维超声心动图研究,以检查心包液在心脏周围的分布情况。虽然超声心动图估计值与手术时实际排出量之间存在良好的相关性(r = 0.78),但仍发现有明显的高估和低估情况。我们的研究结果表明,估计误差部分可归因于精确测量心外膜和心包标志的困难,部分可归因于心包液在心脏周围分布不均匀。