Suppr超能文献

心包引流手术方法的局限性。超声心动图观察。

Limitatoins of surgical methods of pericardial drainage. Echocardiographic observations.

作者信息

Chandraratna P A, Aronow W S

出版信息

JAMA. 1979 Sep 7;242(10):1062-3.

PMID:470048
Abstract

To assess the efficacy of surgical methods of pericardial drainage in preventing the accumulation of pericardial effusion, we performed M-mode and cross-sectional echocardiograms in 26 patients before and one week after the creation of a pericardial window or leaving the pericardium open after cardiac surgery. A pericardial window was created in six patients (group 1) who had pericardial effusions. Group 2 consisted of 20 patients who had heart surgery. Echocardiography disclosed moderate or large pericardial effusions preoperatively in all group 1 patients but in one of the group 2 patients. Following operation, three of the group 1 patients had complete clearing of pericardial effusion, while three showed reaccumulation. In group 2, thirteen patients had either no effusion or a small effusion. Seven patients had moderate or large pericardial effusions that were located posterior to the heart; only one had an anterior pericardial effusion. Cross-sectional echocardiography showed posterior loculation of effusion in six of the seven patients. Pericardial drainage is not always effective in preventing accumulation of pericardial effusions.

摘要

为评估心包引流手术方法在预防心包积液积聚方面的疗效,我们对26例患者在心脏手术后创建心包开窗或心包开放前及术后一周进行了M型和横断面超声心动图检查。6例有心包积液的患者(第1组)创建了心包开窗。第2组由20例接受心脏手术的患者组成。超声心动图显示,术前第1组所有患者均有中度或大量心包积液,而第2组仅1例患者有。术后,第1组3例患者心包积液完全清除,3例出现再积聚。第2组中,13例患者无积液或仅有少量积液。7例患者有中度或大量心包积液,位于心脏后方;只有1例有心包前积液。横断面超声心动图显示,7例患者中有6例积液呈后方局限性。心包引流在预防心包积液积聚方面并不总是有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验