Abu Rahma A F, Boland J, Osborne L
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1983 Mar-Apr;24(2):119-21.
To critically analyze the accuracy of the OPG/Zira unit in the diagnosis of significant carotid artery stenosis, 135 patients (270 carotid arteries) were reviewed in comparison with the biplane carotid arteriograms. For practical purposes the radiological findings were divided into two categories; the first category included patients with normal carotids or carotids with less than 40% stenosis and the second category included patients who had carotid stenosis of greater than 40% (significant stenosis). The 136 arteries with significant stenosis on the arteriograms had positive OPG (136/160); i.e., 85.0% sensitivity, 101/110 arteries had negative arteriograms and negative OPG; i.e., 91.8% specificity. There was 6.2% false positive rate (9/145) and 19.2% false negative (24/125). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 87.7% (237/270).
为严格分析口腔全景片(OPG)/Zira装置诊断严重颈动脉狭窄的准确性,我们回顾了135例患者(270条颈动脉),并与双平面颈动脉血管造影进行比较。出于实际目的,放射学检查结果分为两类:第一类包括颈动脉正常或狭窄小于40%的患者,第二类包括颈动脉狭窄大于40%(严重狭窄)的患者。血管造影显示严重狭窄的136条动脉OPG呈阳性(136/160);即敏感性为85.0%,110条动脉血管造影呈阴性且OPG呈阴性;即特异性为91.8%。假阳性率为6.2%(9/145),假阴性率为19.2%(24/125)。总体诊断准确性为87.7%(237/270)。